/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49935654
>Have you considered what the prices might look like if the GSR reverted to its historical ratio of 1:15? This is what has happened every time there's been a monetary crisis throughout history, and if it happens again, then silver will outperform gold to a far greater degree than the difference in premiums.

This idea only works if you think silver is being suppressed instead of thinking that gold is overvalued. Closing the gap is meaningless if there are no higher returns on either of them. I'm sick of this narrative that silver going to the moon is a sure thing. It isn't and the more I look at the data the more I think that FOMO is at full speed with the speculative expectations. I would have higher hopes if the premiums weren't so fucking high but they are and there's no justification for getting silver while they are this high. If you can get pure silver at spot, you're quids in, anything above 10% is a waste of your wealth.

>>49865473

>>49851496
It is gambling because everything about what you said is a probability. You can't even guarantee that it is going to happen especially when look at the gold silver ratio graph. Where's your evidence that silver will be more than gold.