/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13099865
Great argument

>>8544331
>Oh and I forgot that they'll keep releasing coins thus devaluing the token with inflation.
No, you didn't forget, you already implied that

>Anyway, you're obviously retarded
Look at the image to see the quality of your argument

>>8415016
>fuck you you fucking fuck
How to know when you won the argument

>>7561082
youtu.be/QbvtAlmfYQI?t=2m14s


It's astonishing how people ITT will still defend Blockstream/Bitcoin Core even when they continue to stifle any innovation for Bitcoin. Counterparty (XCP) was ready to implement smart contract functionality and Blockstream did everything they can to block them for attaining this because XCP required on-chain scaling. Luke-jr even blacklisted Counterparty transactions in one of the previous Bitcoin Core releases. Vitalik Buterin was ready to develop smart contract functionality for Bitcoin but he saw how bad XCP was treated and instead opted to make his own altcoin - Ethereum. Yes, that same altcoin that now has the second largest marketcap and is slowly eclipsing Bitcoin was completely unncessary if Blockstream weren't a bunch of kikes and allowed for on-chain scaling.

Now Blockstream has done fuck all to make improvements to Bitcoin since 2013 yet the delusion among Blockstream fanboys stays strong with the supposed implementation of the Lightning Network. LN is vaporware and will never see mainstream adoption, because adoption is stifled by default thanks to the 1MB block size limit and low tp/s. It'll take decades to get a billion people on the Lightning Network. And what does LN boil down to? Essentially swapping IOUs that still need to be settled on-chain. With a 1MB block size limit. Oh, and your Bitcoins can get stolen too if your node loses connection for whatever reason.

Bitcoin could sit mighty on his throne with >90% market dominance if it weren't for Blockstream stifling innovation. As of today Bitcoin sits at a measly 35% market dominance.

>>7490808
>no counterarguments yet again
holy moly the state of corecucks

>>7464937
>Namecalling
top tier corecuck arguments detected

>>7438562
this

Lots of legit arguments ITT. Meanwhile Im accumulating this free 10X

>>7406654
Everybody already knows about Bitcoin segwits inferiority. In the coming market, fundamentals will matter

But you wont bother arguing ITT anyways.

https://youtu.be/2uhPnOyBHQs?t=2682
44:40

>>7307874
Monero is a solid coin. Bch will be adding privacy features in the future but for now you can't go wrong with Monero.

>>7307894
This is the best argument you can hope for coming from core supporters OP. All their arguments fall on the bottom of the triangle.

>>7307901
Not sure what you mean.

>>7256048
They don't.

>>7110847
When in doubt, use this.

So I've been planning on making one of those referral sites where people have to get 10(or another arbitrary number) other people to click on their link, complete a survey(this is the tricky part), and get a prize. A pyramid scheme basically, with no money involved.

Can I get in legal trouble?