/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30351945
>>30351913
Ok, this is going to be a long one.

>>30351913
> I guess BSC, AAVX, XRT, ALGO, DOT, and others are all anecdotal, right?

What are you claiming?
The fact that you can time the market?
Congratulations, you are smart. Now go make billions.
This thread was about debunking XMR claims to fame and not arguing if you are able to market time or not.
If you can market time with various alts, then you can also do that with penny stocks and what not. Good for you. I don't see how that debunks my arguments though.

> Its all the argument that is needed.

I'll bite.
You claim: "BTC belongs in museim"
I say: "Emotionally charged non-argument"
You say: "Nah"
I say: "That is not an argument"
You say: "That is all the argument there is needed".

Ok, how is that all the argument that is needed?

> That means BTC will not be king of the hill forever. Competitors will replace it as time goes on. XMR is just one of the things that could, and probably will, do it.

Ok, so you are going by "tech will get replaced narrative". Alright, and what makes you think XMR will be the one replacing BTC? This is an XMR / BTC outperformance DEBATE and not "will BTC get replaced" debate, so don't try shifting the narrative.

Do recall the fact that:
1) XMR SCALES WORSE THAN BTC
2) XMR attracts MORE regulatory scrutiny
3) XMR has LESS on-ramps and off-ramps
4) XMR has MORE percentage of crime committed on it (can be confirmed by popularity of drug markets)
5) Drug money is LESS in total amounts than institutional investment money
6) If XMR becomes MORE popular it will be MORE CENSORED also as larger "shady" money attracts more restrictions

XMR is effectively a punching bag of the crypto world. If people claim BTC is used for crime, we can say: "No, no, BTC is clean, XMR is the crimecoin". Thanks for taking the hit.