/biz/ - Business & Finance

>mfw iExec RLC solved the data leak and internet security problem and I am going to be very rich

>>50080084
I couldn't imagine being so retarded, he is either fudding to try to buy lower or actually retarded.

RLChads the new roadmap is out !
>https://trello.com/b/oSCT5z09/iexec-adoption-roadmap
Thoughts ?

>>28934843
FUUUUUUUUUCCKKKKKKKCKKCKCK

>>28544061
>WE'LL DO THE MARKETING OURSELVES UNTIL THE TEAM DECIDE TO DO IT AS WELL
THIS IS HOW WE FIX THE MARKETING PROBLEM

IT IS THAT EASY
TAKE IT TO BIZ AND TWITTER, SPREAD WORD OF DIGITAL OIL AND STORE OF COMPUTATIONAL VALUE

THE TEAM WILL BOOST OUR EFFORTS EVENTUALLY

>http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Interoperability_C4IR_Smart_Contracts_Project_2020.pdf
ctrl+f "avalon"
The WEF paper, which is definitely bullish for LINK, is also somewhat bullish for RLC. In the paper, it mentions hyperledger avalon in the offchain computing section. The paper actually talks about the need for off-chain computing and TEEs a lot. Hyperledger Avalon is made up by a lot of groups, but one of the main contributing groups is iExec.
>https://www.hyperledger.org/blog/2019/10/03/introducing-hyperledger-avalon
"It’s also worth understanding a little of the project’s history to see how these communities came together. Avalon began as a reference implementation of the EEA’s Off-Chain Trusted Compute Specification, which sought to standardize how to farm out and reconcile workloads. Coming out of the EEA specification discussions, iExec was excited to build a heart disease evaluation prototype. iExec also immediately dove into building the Ethereum components for Avalon’s proxy model."

Who wrote the EEA’s Off-Chain Trusted Compute Specification? iExec:
https://entethalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/EEA_Off_Chain_Trusted_Compute_Specification_V1_0.pdf

Enterprise won't use blockchain if they have to put all data on chain. iExec's tech is NOT for NEETs who trade shitcoins. It is for enterprises that want to work on Ethereum, but don't want so much data on chain.
iExec is literally designing and writing the standards for the space. We are going to fucking make it boys.

I'm not fucking selling.

>>24820069
Doing gods work anon thank you.

Uhh.. guys there's a massive buy wall on the pair RLC/USDT i'm a complete noob about this, so is this somewhat good or bad ?

>>24725419
Why do you think anyone cares ? We don't really need you, just GTFO seriously

>>24716930
It's already been addressed. It's called eRLC and the stuff you're bringing up is 6 months old FUD.

>>24717134
Yep, comparing shit(link) with a god (rlc) is wrong. So you are 100% correct. It's not link, it's way above link

>just woke up
>My RLC thread from the previous night is still up

Good morning RLChads

>>24694210
Nothing new, you didn't miss anything. It was just a plain presentation and shill

>>24632541
This are Tenor tags I used on most of the gifs: iexec, iexec rlc, rlc, decentralized cloud, nsmdo, the cloud, cloud, world computer, super computer, digital oil, tranny coin, bitcoin of cloud computing, runs lots computers

>>24529959
Look, only about 10k people can have more than you (it's actually less than 10k, since you have more than 8700)... Imagine being a top 10k ETH holder!? Just imagine, you wouldn't have to work ever. You stack is great and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Personally I hold 18.659,2631 RLC and I'm basically 72% in RLC currently and I'll get more as soon as my collateral on Compound/Aave goes up, so I can safely borrow more USDT/USDC

>>24530080
Don't get mad because your stack isn't as big as his!

RLC bros... We are fucking mooning! Is the DOTB upon us?!?!?

Anybody who isn't in already deserves to stay poor.

>>24315000

>>24246240
Congratulations annon, you've made the best decision in your life. We congratulate you!

TOAST to our comrade !

>>24240582
They won't since it's not a security. AMF (= french SEC) already approved it and due to this they will have a great argument for the SEC.

Also your point is stupid. It's like saying they'll classify ETH as a security... They can't classify you as a security if you're actually decentralized, which iExec RLC is. You also need to remember that RLC has big partners in burger town (Nvidia, IBM, Intel, ...) and that these partners will do everything in their power in order to make this work (I'm betting that they're helping them out in this regard, because they want to use iExec RLC)

>>24133876
Yes, but that is THE MOST TIME you have. I mean, I literally presumed that they could announce it on new year, which I'm 100% sure they won't. So I'm guessing you can literally do 39 - 7. So 32 days, since the last week of the year isn't really a "work week" in most cases. So you have a little over 1 month to accumulate

Reminder to anyone "important" reading this.
You cannot deny the fundamentals of iExec RLC.
It has been tried for 4 years now, and no one has beaten me.

Take this into account before it's too late.
Only 25000 people from this point can own 870 RLC.
Only 100,000 people can own 870 RLC.
Only 10,000 people can own 8700 RLC.
Only 1,000 people can own 87,000 RLC.
Only 100 people can own 870,000 RLC.

RLC costs $1.05.
The utility is infinite.
iExec is the compute layer of the blockchain.
iExec is the epitome of "investing in blockchain technology"
iExec is THE blockchain technology.
Do the math.

>>24038992
8700