/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27636094
Believe it or not, ETH 2.0 promises are not even compared to Avalanche's reality; it's STILL unscalable, expensive, slightly slower than Avalanche and it's not even built, Vitalik has been eyefucking Avalanche for the same; he knows ETH would work way better with Avalanche's consensus.
Also, let's remind how Avalanche has been live for barely 4 months, it's just not fair to compare the amount of projects of a 4 months old project with ETH or ADA. In fact, the amount of validators and projects currently being developed over such a newborn project has been absolutely insane; Avalanche is one of the networks with the highest amount of validators all over altcoins, only surpassed by ADA.

>>26526240
it's possible; AVAX was called AVA on the early stages, check out this Vitalik's tweet endorsing AVAX

>>26264782
Vitalik is literally building over AVAX in order to fix ETH's scalability issue, Athereum is a real thing.
Also he has PUBLICLY (pic related) endorsed AVAX a couple times (back then AVAX was named AVA), AVAX and ETH are not competitors.

>>25864468
No what the other anon claimed but Vitalik is very fond of avalanche

>>25006543
AVAX main objective is pretty different and has its own market (tokenization of every real life asset); most ppl compare it to ETH because AVAX can do everything ETH does but cheaper and faster, but in reality they're both aiming for different things
Even Vitalik talked pretty nice about AVAX (pic related) back when it was called AVA

>>24194830
Based Retard (pic related)

>>24194735
Yes

Shit will go to alpha centauri by 2021-2022

>>23471290
Avalanche roots are found in Ethereum's prime ideas what the fuck is ur problem?

Even Vitalik has been supportive on Avalanche. You must be braindead if you actually believe they're competing in a bad manner.

it's funny how avax newbies and eth fanboys flame each other while vitalik himself is supportive over avalanche, and avalanche roots are pretty inspired under ethereum's idea.