/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12042540
>coin's throughput tanking when trying to propagate big blocks is an ad hominem argument
Okay

What will it take for you people to understand that it doesn't fucking work? It's failed empirically already, no intent to actually fix it. BSV is literally just the BCH faction that believes the long term vision can be accomplished with unicorn farts and rainbows, and anyone who is actually trying to get the software to deliver on the possibilities of the hardware is a saboteur.
It blows my mind that people are still honestly falling for this shit. Wake the fuck up. You are proving the coretards actually correct finally about one thing when it comes to people calling them on their bullshit purely by the stupidity with which you pursue your otherwise reasonable goals.
And I'm not fucking responding again and getting dragged into a bullshit negative gamma CTOR is a socialist node subsidy dsv rapes babies cringefest. Just fucking stop already fuuuuck.

Nothing, just like this guy.

>>11944857
SV only pumped because it was coming from a 5:1 ratio behind from the futures market to the actual asset split. It conclusively lost the hashwar and they've proven themselves utterly incompetent. But BCH has always been a target for suppression and hate from the core camp, who still wields a lot of power in the irrational market. Before the fork even happened, shorts on bitfinex for bch were as high as they've ever been. But BCH survived the hashwar completely unscathed. IMHO it's only a matter of time before it goes back up again, while sv will always be a useless shitcoin.

>>11918589
*BREATHES IN*

imagine actually buying a coin that doesn't work or scale as advertised because you like the personality of a fraud LARPING hypeman behind the coin and how he "triggers people" on twitter rather than paying attention to any actual functionality or technical details

>>11916762
Well then you were fucking retarded back then too. You gave up your genuine shot at the promise currently being delivered on by BCH because you fell for a blowhard making threats who can't even make his ripoff chain work.

>>11908527
How else would you describe hostile chain reorgs and rollback implemented by well financed attackers with the agenda to destroy the ledger other than a bug that requires fixing?
BSV provoked those changes with their irrational idiocy. And their chain is the one that remains vulnerable to those attacks, more vulnerable even with half the hashpower of BCH now protecting it. Wouldn't it be a shame if someone turned around and did to their shit tier chain what they had threatened to do to others? Tragedy I'm sure.

>>11861926
The blockstream changes implemented were idiotic and not backed by hashpower, so the narrative from the bch side that hashpower would always signal the correct thing was observably correct at the time.
But after a year long bear market and slump largely due to the idiotic changes the hashpower had originally signaled against and the market *still* irrationally preferring those changes over the correct approach, hashpower on the legitimate bitcoin chain was so low it was practical to invest in an attack to attempt to destroy that legitimate chain, which is what nChain is.
So now the BCH faction were faced with a situation in which the hashpower was signalling for idiotic changes, and they addressed it in two ways, firstly by being willing to countersignal against that hashpower in the exact same way, even to the extent of unprofitable mining, because rational BCHers are in this for the long term and prepared to sacrifice in the short to protect it. And secondly by making security changes that mean even the hostile hashrate signaling for incorrect changes --will never get its fucking way-- making it economically irrational for them to even continue to try. That they sperg out uselessly and keep up their bullshit social media attacks whining about how unfair it is that they've been hard blocked out of the process after proving bad faith is of zero consequence. They lost in every way imaginable, and the plan for BCH pulled through and is proceeding apace despite the massive failed attack.

>>11856333
> Muh 7d chess
Meme tier mutts abound today I see.

>>11842765
SV cunts are stupid too.

>>11836786
His ass

>>11826395
Because all that shit you're saying is completely wrong, BCH works, SV does not, and everyone had been saying all along this is exactly what would happen.

What does this mean?

>>11820568
It never was abc was unequivocally correct. Absorb and understand pic related.

>>11820439
It doesn't matter what he cares about. He's fucking incompetent. He won't listen to people that have rubbed the technical facts of on chain scaling in his face for months now and as a result just keeps ignorantly insisting its all magic and everything will work fine. He is like the villager in the boy who cried wolf who heard core lie their asses off on the subject so would not even consider that there was actually some merit to their position at orders of magnitude higher. ABC took this into account and optimized actual propagation. SV idiotically ignored it and just mindlessly raised the block limit and the result is pic related.
Look I've got all the sympathy in the world for the economic position of Craig if not his fucking retarded attempt to push it by technically ignorant means, but the guy is a waste of oxygen that simply cannot admit when he's wrong or actually analyse the territory in which he's operating at from any other perspective than plagiarism of superior thinkers on tune subject and dick waving.
He needs to be fucking purged.