/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55513686
>it is not the same
If I can trust a smaller number of chains to be correct then I can have lower conf times, is that wrong?
Or is the fact that the block is lagging behind leading to the whole network not being able to move forward to the next block? That would be a little more troubling but the guy is talking about tx times in his blogpost.
>You're retarded
Sure but the miner validates the transactions and nodes verify that it's correct, miners should mine all chains and nodes can run any chain they like. In theory.
Here some bullshit devs said in 2021
>A full node is centralized service that can be scaled at cloud level, just like any modern global cloud service. Because of that I don't see a benefit of running partial consensus nodes -- at least not for miners. It may make sense for API nodes that only validate blocks for local use, but don't fully participate in consensus.
>>55513699
The point is that at that point you would be making 1M tps, it's like complaining about amazon needing so much hardware while missing the revenue generating part about the whole company.