/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13283852
>>13283856
>>13283866
>>13283928
>>13283938
It's weird. in the beginning I was fudding Link to accumulate more. which I did ultimately when it was around 13 cent. I amassed 650K Link. I definately think I have enough to make it. the problem though is that I can't stop fudding my own investment where I am literally all-in with my life savings. I designed some of the most hated and posted memes regarding Chainlink. again... I am all-in with my live savings and I have no intention whatsoeva to shill this project. instead I went to insane lengths to meme fud whenever I can. sometimes I sit a whole day in front of the screen and I FUD FUD FUD FUD. I don't something is wrong with me. but since I have invested in Chainlink I feel verydifferent. my behavior makes absolutely no sense... yet I am 100% sure I have to FUD my own investment.

>>13178407
All them nigggas want these lanks. These is muh lanks. This some George Jetson shit right here niggga. This shit right here niggga. This shit right here. Tis the future. Nigggas gone be knowing how many watermelons still at the store at any given moment and shiiiet. All thanks to blockchainz and shiiiet. Is the future niggga.

>>13121224
I'm perplexed... Because I was telling myself that I was gonna make it with my 1488-hitlersergey-api.node selling data to deutsche bank jews. Now it's 1 year later yet again and still no mainnet, am I going to be disappointed again? Am I still as deluded? I heard a Chainlink team guy literally say first half of 2019... But.. I don't know man, it doesn't seem right to make it so easily.
Think I'm selling it all on this latest PnD

>>13112739
I'm so sick of this project everyday I wait and everyday nothing happens I've been in it since 2017 there used to be good conversation about it but those days seem to be gone I used to like the fact that the company was low-key and under the radar but it has gotten to the point where it's getting worrisome no one seems to be able to answer the simple question of "is this nothing more than a funding token" and "how much value can the network actually capture" everything is purposefully obfuscated b/c I don't think Sergey and team actually have the answers to these questions and we still after 18 months don't have announcements of major real partnerships it's all literal who scam crypto projects that probably won't be around in 9 months plus I'm getting really sick and tired of seeing off these dumb " is 10k enough to make it" no you retard it's not let's assume an average price of .02c per api call which is generous; to be able to make $200 per day from staking rewards from a measly 10k link stack that would mean the total value flowing through the network would have to be over $1 billion per day which is short bus tier retard levels to think that is possible sure maybe it's possible in 2049 but in case you have forgotten we are living in the year 2019 so unless you bought link to put in a trust for your great grandkids I am afraid there will be more than 1000 suicides eoy which is sad b/c I don't wish neccing oneself over money but due to Sergey and Steve and Thomas coming on this board at times to feed us fake breadcrumbs it has given neets around the world hope they never had before so that in turn gave them something to look forward to but when the curtain goes up and last call is called the emperor shall be revealed to have no clothes and that my friends is when the 1000 suicides will start which on one hand sucks on the other hand I think anything that is done to help reduce our population numbers Is a good thing.

>>13103490
I'm gay and I hold chainlink.

Short $LINK, 10,000,000,000x leverage.

Hmmm, good point.

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.