/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15138501
Based

>>14926459
Call me retarded then I don't give a fuck.
Been shorting since 3.80 and making 3x the whole way down.

>>14660028
This is a Delphi signal to accumulate LINK

>>14412460
Just place a limit so we know you are not larping, set it at like 2.10 or something.

>>11610243
This anon gets it, you "hodlers" are pathetic. I only buy cheap linkies.

*** NOT FUD - PLEASE READ *** Considering the use cases for smart contracts, I feel uncertain whether the ChainLink network will be an obvious choice for large private/public companies.

The way I see it is there are 3 choices:

1) The large private/public companies will provide their own private oracle solution that isn't a market product (Microsoft cryplets?) which will enable companies such as Microsoft to maximise private control over their smart contracts/blockchain networks.

2) The use of centralised oracle services available in the market such as Oraclize. Centralised oracles also appear to allow for more private quality control and access rights over the data that interacts with smart contracts.

3) Take the fully decentralised approach of ChainLink, decreasing the internal control that companies have over their data/smart contract interactions.

From these three I can obviously see the 1st option being cost ineffective for most businesses (unless you're somebody like Microsoft).

The 2nd and 3rd options now come in to play: to choose a centralised oracle service that relies more on internal security to verify data, or a decentralised oracle service that is prone to data manipulation through 51% attacks in data networks (however obviously the POS system acts as a deterrent to this).

I may not be fully understanding of the way that these systems work as I don't come from any coding/programming backgrounds - so please bear with me or correct any of my assumptions.

The hype around Chainlink's decentralisation has serious merit, but I'm unsure whether or not it will be more secure than private solutions in its early adoption stages.

I see this as a crucial step for future mass adoption as should ChainLink's be unreliable in its early stages, the next 5-10 years of smart contract adoption could stick in the mindset that centralalised data/oracle solutions are more secure/reliable and that decentralised services are superflous to smart contract functionality.

Only for the true linkers / high IQ thread

100k link marine here. Anons I need u to tell me if I'm wrong, but my feeling is that we are not supposed to be invited to the future boom of API market. Sergei knows we are here but he's hardly working right now to Revolutionize the Derivatives market and the crypto world But he's doing this for "they", the big guys and Nick S., not for us. So we just have to wait the huge wave, surely eoy when mainnet is released. I feel like we are the insiders of the biggest next revolution in crypto for the next 2-3 years. AB and the true biz detectives know it. Hold strong marines!

>>8819649
Your lack of faith will be punished during the great cleansing of no linkers and the upcoming singularity.

Your blasphemy will be mocked in screen shots where billionaires cannot believe people were not buying LINK at under $1000 USD.

>>7745102
no livestream but there will be an audio recording

>>7697000
>>7697044
>>7697166
>>7697288
>>7697599
>>7697899
>>7698000
>>7698100
>>7698177
>>7698999

BLESSED ARE THE LINK MARINES
FOR THEY WILL BE CALLED THE CHILDREN OF SERGEY
FOR THEIRS IS THE KINGDOM OF LAMBOS

forever

>>5160946
a true linkmarine, ready to die for his fellow bagholders