/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30354448
>What is too little and what is too late?
>
>How is it exactly "too late"?
>
>At which exact moment in time it became "too late"?

The moment BTC launched. Optional privacy retrofitted as an afterthought can NEVER be as reliable as default full-spectrum privacy built from the ground up.

Bitcoin will thus NEVER be able to do what Monero does and suggesting otherwise is delusional.

>>30293712
>no it's not. that's a retarded thing to say. but i' not sending my coins to a mixer until regulation clears up that's for sure.

If you HAVE to mix and jump through an array of hoops just to achieve a modicum of privacy and fungibility, something ain't right.

>>29760358
>only if you fuck up.

In other words, you can't just use Bitcoin as is, you also have to develop a very particular set of mixing skills and then HOPE you did everything right, even though the best possible Bitcoin privacy is still inferior to Monero's privacy.


>but when about 90% of the bitcoins will be owned by fortune 500 companies this will be a completely moot argument anyhow.

Nobody outside of the BTC echo chamber actually thinks this will happen.