/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21271244
I'm not an academic, I hate academics. That's why the confusion. I can see that you're a academic and that your level of theoretical knowledge is far beyond mine. I just know how to program in like 15-20 programming languages, I'm not involved in a deep level on any of them. I have basic understandings of AI, robotics, multi-threading, web design, back-ends, mobile applications, ... I mostly worked in Go, VueJS, python, C#.

Now that you provided an example I do understand.
You're interested in "How do i know if this faggot is passing me random bullshit, instead of actually computing what I want?" The answer is rather simple. The worker actually doesn't know what it's computing for the client, it just knows what it has to do to get the actual result. That's how TEE works. The data is encrypted in a way that the worker can work on it, but it doesn't know what it's working on... I gave a link to the youtube channel of iExec a few posts above. I know there's a few videos where Gilles Fedak explains this. I cba to find it really, but if you make your own research you can check this is true.

The 3) point. ah sorry, I miss understood that. I have no clue in all honesty. And your point is valid and good. But I would argue since they're in this shit they've got that shit covered. Since your point is a big concern of course. And they probably wouldn't ignore it. And due to Gilles Fedak being a pioneer in cloud computing and distributed computing itself (you can check google schoolar for his research papers if you're interested. I recommend you do) he probably knows what he's doing. I can trust him at least that much

This point) Also the results aren't on the blockchain (which would be hilariously expensive), so whatever you said about GDPR isn't true either.

Yes they are. The result itself gets verified twice, as i already mentioned earlier. First by RLC, then ETH. The off-chain part isn't verified ofcourse, because as I explained earlier it's in a TEE

>>20598152
PROOF THAT MICROSOFT
(((((((IS MAYBE POTENTIALLY LIKELY)))))))))))
USING IEXEC
YOU FUCKING 3RD WORLD PAJEETS NEED TO LEARN ENGLISH

>>20576974

>>20535451
Based and GETOVERHEREpilled

>>20533287
>valuable service while the overseeing company takes a cut
iExec takes 0% in transaction fees on the network.
Nice fud

>>20435286
Partnerships don't matter. Every provider, cloud, tech giant, etc will all join the bitcoin of cloud computing marketplace.

>>20434684
B A S E D

>>20398709
>linkies are exiting into RLC because link cant do SGX TEE or staking in their oracles while RLC has had it for 2 years

>>20390546
>IT'S LITERALLY DUMPING

IT'S LITERALLY PUMPING.

EVER HEARD OF OVERSOLD WICKS?

OF COURSE NOT, YOU DONT KNOW HOW TO TA.

YOU ARE A NEWFAG.

BUY DIGITAL OIL RLC OR PERISH.

>>20371066
YOU STILL HAVE TIME TO TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT ANON. I BELIEVE IN YOU. DID YOU MISS THE ALPHA PART? YEAH, GOOGLE DOESN'T JUST LET ANYONE ALPHA TEST. PLEASE RE-READ.

>>20371034
CONGRATULATIONS ANON. I REALLY HOPE YOU COULD GRASP EVERYTHING I PUT DOWN.

COMPUTE OVER HERE!!

>>20312077
u missed the dip

Damn it OP. You charismatic bastard. Just bought 100 RLC tokens. Godspeed!

>>20206791
Within the day.

Save the memes and use them anons. RLC needs help against the pajeet scammers

>>17319539

No.

LINK needs RLC for multiple types of computational power.

"Insufficiency of computational resources and an associated rise in the price of Link Tokens could result in businesses being unable to acquire scarce computational resources to run their distributed applications. This could result in lost revenues and disruption or halting of business operations."

https://chain.link/terms

WE ARE GOING TO MAKE IT RLCHADS
WE ARE THE CHOSEN ONES
FUCK BIZ U PAJEETS

will 3x before December 13th

>>16079058
70 CENTS 70 CENTS 70 CENTS 70 CENTS 70 CENTS 70 CENTS 70 CENTS 70 CENTS

you have been warned.
top 50 EOY

This is now an iExec board.

Don't say I didn't warn you.