/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10301899
Making an irrationally emotional imperative remark that I leave without describing an actual reason to refute my dichotomy between revenue and personal expenses is not an argument.
You're implying that i'm a woman doesn't make that an argument, and what would be really pathetic is if I was a woman and still am better at a stereotypical male enterprise as presenting logical discourse without resorting to non-sequitur, emotive outbursts.
So you know what, sure, I'm a big pussy flapping roastie who bangs chads and gets them to spend money on me?
How does that make you feel?
Pretty fucking terrible probably because you let it!

Let me reiterate my point for you're benefit:
>We come on here to make money
>How we spend money doesn't matter, you're a closet faggot, the personal expenses are irrelveant to fruitful discussion
>Only betas waste money on bitches
>The definition of a 'beta' is a male who is mentally imprisoned by the notion that female unobtainability in someway defines their lifestyle
>Additionally, assume time = money
>it takes time to make these threads
>incidentally you're letting women live rent free in your head while making these threads (spare me the accusation of irony - if anything it only further illustrates the financial absurdity of this thread) and time = money: so you're WASTING MONEY ARGUING THIS POINT

I'm not saying women aren't attracted to wealth or social status.
I'm saying that this thread is a waste of your time, my time, everyone's time.
but you won't even read the wardrobe comment above because you're already so deep into confirmation bias that you can't even pose an argument.