/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27372475
I did actually but in RETL as opposed to GME

If you insist on throwing your money away on GME, buy RETL instead. You get almost the same upside and much less downside. It's a 3x ETF with GME in it. If GME drops, the other stocks in RETL will hold the price, if GME moons, it will drag RETL with it and since it is 3x leveraged, RETL will move up almost as much as GME. It's a subtle point of why you get the upside without the downside but it stands.

If you insist on throwing your money away on GME, buy RETL instead. You get almost the same upside and much less downside. It's a 3x ETF with GME in it. If GME drops, the other stocks in RETL will hold the price, if GME moons, it will drag RETL with it and since it is 3x leveraged, RETL will move up almost as much as GME. It's a subtle point of why you get the upside without the downside but it stands.

Banned from buying GME? Buy GAMR or XRT instead. They're ETFs that both derive about 27% of their value from GME right now. They move similarly to GME and buying options in GAMR or XRT will give you a similar effect to the direction and percentage moves of GME. If you just buy shares of either of the ETFs, you will move in the same direction of GME just at a lower percentage so it may be even safer if you think GME is too risky.
Pic related shows the three charts stacked to highlight the similarity.

>>27215394
Full retard mode, use RETL the 3x leveraged ETF chock full of GME goodness

>>27184327
>RETL compared to GAMR, XRT, and GME
Yeah, there's some GME in RETL. It's 3x leveraged too so it's going to swing hard if GME does. Could be a good contender.
>>27184904
FUCK OFF MELVIN