/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55090792
they are transactions nonetheless. Muh ordinal inscriptions are also spam and BTC is puking itself. All degens wish they didn't have to pay ludicrous fees to the miners.

Soon they'll deploy their HD 3d "art" somewhere else. Have onchain data and construct their muh metaverse shit on an SHA256 chain with tiny deploy and mint costs.


example, a frogger mmorpg game with randomly created characters that players own and play onchain for 5 cents a pop. Do you want to pay a 30sat/vb and wait 3 days for the tx to clear? Not really.

Don't you understand that anybody responsible for creating tx on btc now is a BSV og? Ordswap, ordinalwallet, unisat? ALL BSVers.
PSBT, on chain auctions blah and blah will take months to be implemented.... hours later it's done because it's child's play for BSVers. We are 5-10 years more advanced. Slowly, then all of a sudden the market will understand. But yeah, keep on shitting on BSV.

picrel, we have been here before.

>>54856408
create paymail at relayx.com

buy BSV via USDC at https://buy.relayx.com/

buy ORD on https://relayx.com/market/ORD

congrats, no shitty 20 inscriptions or hell knows how high fees or high wait times needed to just dip your toes into the water.

INB4 but BSV... everything is onchain, if need be you can bridge out.

ORDI does not and will never have functionality except maybe number go up, therefore it doesn't matter if you are on BTC or as a wrapped token on BSV.

tx fees are way way lower, actually sending the USDC is the most expensve part of this route. Can be circumvented if you have access to an exchange with BSV, then send directly to your paymail.

By the way, there is already a swap and pool BSV/ORD on relayx too. DEFI shitcoin galore.

relayx are the guys behind ordswap.io.

BSVers are behind unisat.

All that jazz has been on BSV since ages, /biz is sleeping on BSV because muh faketoshi. The tech is sound.

>>54563050
you really wanna know anon?

small blockers won.

'We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.'

>>54300242
>>54300261
>>54300273
>>54300315
>>54300351

quod erat demonstrandum anon.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

then

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

>>54174820
>>54174010

Me too, came 2013.

Invested in eth ico with 1337eth per BTC because I also wanted computing on chain. I found out later that AXA and tptb already coopted bitcoin.

I hated csw, sign just a single transaction you fraud. But then, in dubio pro reo, let the accused talk and went down the rabbit hole. Hours, days, weeks, months. Yes, he was talking about the Bitcoin I saw too. I am all in, and yes, it fucking hurts. I could have been happy in 8 figure hell alone by my eth. It is what it is. BSV is Bitcoin. Everything else is delusion or outright scam.

Give yourself an hour and read this:
https://link.medium.com/BjmoDcIvey

Forget Craig, look at the fundamental mechanics and economics of onchain world. Follow the data. Do not, and that is a big ask, look at the price. Be a Warren Buffet, look at the fundamentals and then at the price.

Most of all, use it. Get yourself 2 usd worth and see what you can do with it outside of just speculating that number goes up.

By the way, nfts on Bitcoin, data on chain? BSV has been doing it since forever.

>>52731269
BTC reached that point long ago.


Stop lying to yourself at least.


https://zemgao.com/a-mathematical-proof-that-craig-s-wright-is-satoshi-nakamoto/

>>52445940
7 tps....7*60*60*24*365= 220,752,000 On chain movements. Be it to open, close, transact, whatever. BTC is fucked.

220 million tx per year....


Big blocks or GTFO

defi on another platform nnnn and demand for ethereum plummets....tdxp.app shows what is possible.

>>25888052
you have to usse bitcoin, not high fee piece of shit segwit shitcoin BTC.

Use BSV, on the real bitcoin fees are miniscule by design

>>23962409
high fees because corecuks kept the 1mb blockcap.

Fees are high again btw....

>>23645191
doesnt metter. If BTC go up 10x other shotcoins will go up 10x or more.

>>23630220
It's a serious problem, that fanatics are not talking about .Bitcoin was designed to give block rewards only at the beginning so that miners would have incentive to mine. After some time miners would start to earn more and more from fees. And in the end there would be no block reward, and miners would earn revenue purely from fees. The problem is, that there is an artificial limitation which limits blocksize to 1 MB blocks, and lets people to perform only around 4 tx/s. Because of that there is only a fixed amount of transactions that can be made in one moment which means, that costs of performing transaction will cost hundreds of dollars. Today it is $12,5. The solution is simple. Just lift off the block size limit completely. Let miners to compete for making big blocks, which would mean revenue for miners, and low fees for users. The problem is, that bitcoin was overtaken by Bildenberg group through blockstream.

>>23608035
BSV is literally in an uptrend. I know, that BSV is the future, and no matter what happens BTC is going to 0, because of scaling, lack of stable protocol, not keeping with WP, blockstream, and multiple other reasons. I said that time will tell, because neither side will give up on their believes.
Crypto space is so small, that current community doesn't matter at all. Since bitcoin is unusable, people have started to look for alternatives. And that won't stop, unless BTC gets scalable. The problem is, that it won't.

>>23604954
It's not impossible for BSV to go to 0. But it's still way more likely for BTC to go to 0 before BSV does.

>>23601503
It doesn't matter if transactions are made by humans, or if it's weather data. Pushing lots of transactions shows, that we can scale. Doing the same on BTC would be impossible, as they have 1MB block size limit, while BSV's average blocks have 2MB in size.
The whole traffic on ETH is made because of the whole DeFi craze. Nobody is using it for anything useful, except for speculating with uniswap shitcoins.

>>23592098
*minor*

>>23461386
Just buy BTC. LN is very good Sir.

>>23444267
it really is beatiful.


Not being balls deep in BSV in 2020, ngmi.

>>22886660
>>22885802
>>22885083
Stiff.
>>N

>>22796547
>BTC
crippled 1mb chain which stifles adoption forcing high fees. Price will stay high for a couple more years till normies realize its unusable
>BCH
chinese fork of ppl who support illegal/unregulated stuff. Community will split in november, will slowly di off afterwards
>BSV
the original bitcoin protocol unleashed. Will keep attracting developers due to highest capacity and lowest fees, initially price will be suppressed because of people hating csw and not understanding tech, in ~5 years will be the dominant version since a bunch of killer apps will have been built on it

>>22545704
(still me) some relevant datapoints in pictures

>>22526588
>bsv has shown it can handle 17k tx/s on mainnet. btc caps at 7 tx/s
true, i was talking about average tps these days, rather than peak possible tps, but indeed bsv has much higher capacity