/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11841998
And to continue on my point and assumption. Let's get pic related for example. Oh boy, there's a flaw in the SGX oh shit oh shit, but like I said.

This
is
INTEL

>None of this is good, but there is some less-bad news. The researchers that discovered it have been working with Intel for months — almost, in fact, since the first Spectre and Meltdown details dropped.

I don't know what You guys are thinking, but if You follow Intel SGX FUD because some idiots asking hyphotetical question about security of the system, then :
A- You can't trust most established company with your data, so Intel CPU out.
B-You don't realize that they are spending top bucks for people that are testing the system with intention to break it, hack it every single day

Either way that FUD is just stupid and irrevelant to me. Intel won't slip, and with that level of power and money- hacks/breach of the system won't even make it into news. They would rather pay millions on the side for a guy/group to explain it and patch it, and hackers do it for money first.

Weird that I had to explain basics of IT world on /biz/