/biz/ - Business & Finance

This low-IQ g0fFAykF anon probably ignored this excellent thread, containing picrel chart, which specifically warned about the 1W being topped: https://archived.moe/biz/thread/54579710 -- BTC then rose a mere $700, and then dumped $5000; proving that anon correct.

Imagine FOMOing in between 30k and 31k. Seeing picrel in mid April. Choosing to ignore it (because you're low IQ) and to not secure your funds (because "but I bought so the market must respect my feelings and pump!"). Coping with "noo, it's totally gonna stay at 100!" and using the "muh lagging indicator" cope. And then: reality hits you. Then you endlessly cry and seethe on /biz/ instead of admitting to yourself you fucked up.

Seething baggies, I summon thee!

Imagine fomoing in between 30k and 31k. Seeing picrel in mid April, yet choosing to ignore it (because you're low IQ) and to not secure your funds (because "but I bought so the market must respect my feelings and pump!"). Coping with "noo, it's totally gonna stay at 100!" and using the "muh lagging indicator" cope. Then reality hits you. Then you endlessly cry and seethe on /biz/ instead of manning up and admitting yourself you fucked up.

>>54946777
based, picrel was the stoch rsi on april 13th, we had so many thread about it topping there's zero legit excuse to be a pinkjak now

>>54944532
>>54944574
Who could've possibly foreseen this? If only there had been some way of knowing in advance that it would dump. The market sure is a total mystery.

You now remember this thread, from April 13th. The thread: https://archived.moe/biz/thread/54579710

And hey, seethers from that thread? You're now seething again, being reminded of this.
Enjoy being pink and frothing with anger and tearing your hair out and crying.

>>54906713
From 31k it's more than an 11% drop so far.

>>54897137
Who could've possible foreseen this selling? If only there had been some way of knowing about it in advance.

>>54896279
You had so many chances to sell around 30k. So many bobochads warned you over and over again about the 1W Stoch RSI. Picrel is from April 13th. You know that particular pic was posted A LOT... you saw it, and yet you didn't secure your funds. This is the future you chose.

>>54746880
>>54746918
zoom out newfags

>>54722979
>redditard fomos in at the top of the rally with the 1W Stoch RSI looking like this
Wow what a shock.

>>54695050
Of course not. See the 1W Stoch RSI. Picrel is from April 13th. See what it's at now. There's your answer. Right now the 1D is bottomed however so expect a small pump.

>>54689942
We did what we could. Some listened, others really wanted to turn pink. Can't save everyone.

>>54689668
No, see the weekly stoch rsi, picrel, but after this has bottomed then it'll probably pump a lot since the monthly looks bullish.

>>54688971
>t. ignored the 1W Stoch RSI and got his longs liquidated

>>54683460
A lot of screaming and crying at picrel by the baggies hoddling since 60k.

>>54686659
cope and cringe, seethe moar

>>54684087
This is what happened and is happening. Take a look at what it looks like now.

>>54684237
The profit-undoing/cancellation could've easily been prevented by selling near the top of the rally. I know "sell" might be a scary word, but think of it like "securing your funds" instead if that helps.

>>54684070
It's the pattern than occurs after Bitcoin's 1W Stoch RSI looked like this.

>>54683529
They'll slurp when the 1W Stoch RSI bottoms.

>>54683916
>what the fuck
Why the confusion and shock?

>>54683854
imagine seeing this and choosing to ignore it

lmao even

>>54579710 <-- The original thread with all the glorious brainlet/baggie seething and coping.
> "Just imagine, there are people who fomo'd in around 30k."
Yeah remember that thread? Imagine seeing picrel and not getting it, and instead choosing to rage due to having low intelligence – only to later turn pink.

The market-ignoring reality-denying seethers in that thread, their blood is now boiling with anger (partly at themselves no doubt). What's even more glorious though is some of those seethers – those who recently bought and aren't just long-term baggies from between 35k and 69k – are refusing to admit to themselves they were in the wrong and will NOT secure their funds to minimize their profit-loss, or cut their losses while they're small (those who bought around 30k); no, they'll hoddel witth le diamond hands all the way to the bottom of the crash. Absolutely beautiful.

Also: >>54666666