[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.26939701 [View]
File: 874 KB, 320x192, 1407015506609.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26939701

>>26939364
>Kraken says verify time takes 1 to 2 minutes
>its been 4 hours
>feels bad

>> No.14541625 [View]
File: 874 KB, 320x192, godfuckingdamnit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14541625

PRIVATE STINKY REPORTING FOR DUTY

>> No.2855860 [View]
File: 874 KB, 320x192, 1493338432607.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2855860

IS THERE A FUCKING MINUTE LEVEL HISTORICAL DATA PROVIDER WHO ISNT SHIT

I thought QuantQuote would be ok, and then I find this shit:

https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/18822/why-are-quantquote-historical-trades-different-vom-activetick-historical-trades

Every fucking user in that thread has ONLY POSTED IN THAT THREAD, except a dude that doesn't really weigh in either way

Someone allegedly verified that QQ is lying about their office location (???), then we have an alleged official support email that points out user error EXCEPT ANOTHER ANSWER SAYS THAT
>it could be that QuantQuote corrected their data since the original post and the poster just got a bad order. I wouldn't be surprised, it is not the first time they have done a bait and switch with their price data. As other posters have reported, QuantQuote has run multiple forks of their data in the past to conceal errors.

GOD DAMNIT I JUST WANT TO MAKE MONEY

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]