/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30086381
Yeah, I mean I know it's already possible. I'm saying that we'll either come up with a much more efficient way of doing it or find another superconductive metal to take its place. Either way it's going to result in a much higher price for silver.
And again, that's just assuming that the price isn't being manipulated (we know it is, there are lawsuits and fines that say so) and that there is no squeeze (more questionable, but we know at least that the pipeline isn't functioning at a high enough level to meet demand).

anyone here SOXX instead of SOXL?

>>27543256
That looks so much nicer than the ones I make. I should have got out at 400, but I bought into the hype and rode it down to 130. Still came out ahead since I bought in at 97 though. I originally got out when Burry got out. I should have stayed out then. RIP.