[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.19247336 [View]
File: 29 KB, 480x270, black-dynamite-20100216053927990-000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19247336

Is there anything besides DAG that has vertical scalability?

>> No.15470308 [View]
File: 29 KB, 480x270, black-dynamite-20100216053927990-000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15470308

>>15470225
Well there is no proof of OP's claim of the Journo, or any of his statements for that matter, so I'm saying to go get one if you don't already and call the SEC. I seriously don't believe a single crock of shit OP, who is the same ICO FUDDER who posts the same pasta in every DAG thread because he never provides any proof for his claims, just says "you had to be there, its gotta be true, they will not answer the questions and I know they are broke trust me."

So I am completely in favor of those who believe it is a scam, go find a journo and send em. Watch em get denied by the devs for comment because they aren't entitled to shit for just being "a journo." So because that supposed notion of unlocked the pandoras box of accusations against DAG's devs, but by all means go that route, I think it would be more direct (and again, you can do them simultaneously, we are in agreement) to JUST CALL THE FUCKING SEC IF YOU BELIEVE YOUR SHIT.

Stop pussyfooting around with these threads about suspicions, speculations, or accusations, and just fucking end them if you truly are right. Because I don't believe your ass.

>>15470209
>Snapshot posting
Now this is hilarious.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]