/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53556323
>If AI continues to advance at its current pace
Its threads like these when I'm reminded that /biz/ has no idea how long AI has been researched into. Its been a long time. An incredibly long time, serious studies and implementations go all the way back to when CompSci as a field was established.
People who worked on the fucking Manhattan Project had ideas about Cellular Automatons and Perceptron, it was part of the technological boom for the second world war.

Most AI has only got better because of GPUs, image recognition and stuff is only passing human interpretation because of how cheap it is to train AI on MNIST datasets. When you're looking at datasets like ImageNet, specifically expanded and large to strain and produce state-of-the-art Neural Nets, then you start seeing the short comings.
Yes, physical work is not going to be affected by AI, but AI as it is right now, is still incredibly far from Human Intelligence. The fact that we cannot get above like 60% accuracy when it comes to being able to identify what some free-hand sketch is, with large varied datasets is proof that we have a long while to go.

Introduce any ambiguity, any sort of bias into your dataset and your AI fucking fails, and no surprise, there's been numerous examples of this in the past. Amazon had a failure of an AI, Google has shut down a few, we can go on with this. AI isn't at the point where we can replace humans because they haven't learned to think like humans, they're just specialised for human tasks. AGI is the field you want to look at, and that's barely going anywhere.
Then again, you're the same retards throwing thousands at crypto projects that don't go anywhere and don't understand the buzzwords they're using.

Is a 3D printer a good investment?
Would it be possible to make a decent amount of money by purchasing a high quality 3D printer, printing sci-fi / normie shit and selling it online?

>>5128484
You have to think like someone who has no fucking clue what they're doing.
Completely disregard market cap, and never read a whitepaper in your life.
When something hits ATH, that's a good time to invest. :^)
Pic related is how this will end.

>>4440286
Rollin

1HMJXmvgCfXjZokkDQBHnazyWNLLSkawZw

Do you think that bitcoin will ever actually enter bear market again, unless it gets some unexpected FUD?
Is there any reason to wait for a dip before buying in?
I sold most of my position in bitcoin at $7700 just before it plumetted.
Was going to buy back in at around $5500, which I know it dipped to for a few seconds.
Was this the dip? Is that the best we're going to get? It seems to be on a steady uptrend once again.

>>3724385
How will we be updated on the type of service you'll be using to give out this info? Unless you're planning on doing it before this thread 404s.