/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15975901
And that's not factoring in continued scarcity around the equilibrium point, which I'd assume I need to do actual math on...something that my forgot PEMDAS a decade ago ass probably isn't equipped to do.

So to sum up a bunch of nonsense posts on a thread that will die with no replies

>just hold you fucking faggot, stop being a moonsoi adhd zoomer. Then we suicide pact EOY 22 if it isn't 1k and 5%+

>>15881786
You guys are asking hypotheticals that can't be answered because it's not done yet. Quite annoying and half a step above "hurry when moon".

My personal speculation, from doing my own research, is it will be however the requestors (customers) want. Much like every other variable sirgay has said that the market will decide. CL is just a framework, it's up to the participants to make the rules.

The reality is that the people asking these brainlet questions aren't going to be running a (profitable) node...so you won't need the answer. Just throw it in a pool and let someone else worry about all this dumb whatifs for a 1% fee.

Hypothetically there can't/won't be any significant loss once there is some adoption. Once companies start using smart contracts it won't stop, or even slow...only increase. Market selling will be a small blip instantly eaten up, but there is no off button besides complete failure or a competitor completely taking over.

Dips only happen in speculating chink coins and variable total supply donothingtc. The cost of finite industrial resources doesn't go down....only up