/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53034730
>Aren't they effectively the same thing?
no, but DOT and ATOM have similar designs since they all scale horizontally. The main difference here is that AVAX subnets can grow to any size because there is no limit in concurrent participating validators unlike Nakamoto and Classic consensus which is limited to around 100.

>>52715350
updated version

>>51522345 (OP)
they are both good and have overlapping design. anons saying one or the other is shit is a retard that doesn't understand anything about AVAX or ATOM.

>>51522456
>>51522481
fuck off jeets, nobody cares about your centralized sidechain

>>51522504
>ICE PENIS blows both of these garbage coins
with what tech? any of it been released? does anyone use it?
currently ICP does nothing except fall in price and trap credulous niggers like yourself into becoming eternal bagholders and shills for a vaporware scam.

>>51522345
they are both good and have overlapping design. anons saying one or the other is shit is a retard that doesn't understand anything about AVAX or ATOM.

>>51522456
>>51522471
fuck off jeets, nobody cares about your centralized sidechain

>>50443553
ATOM is a just bunch of chains bridged through IBC. DOT is the real hub-and-spoke chain, but it's limited to 100 parachains and small validator sets because of Nakamoto consensus. Avalanche takes the best of Cosmos and DOT and uses Avalanche consensus' unlimited validator cap to remove limits on the hub size.
Every validator is part of the hub (in AVAX's case the 3 primary networks), but it's not really a hub because the 'spokes' sit inside of it. Subnets sit inside the hub, rather than outside. Pic explains it better.

>>49317194
>Ice Pee chads are one of the most vibrant anti-avalanche users from /biz/
random shitcoin cults have been taking turns attacking avax threads since mainnet. first it was HBAR schizos, then KDA troons, now it's ICP but honestly they are so retarded that I'm thinking it's an elaborate psyop.
>DOT/ATOM/AVAX
makes sense