[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.19922295 [View]
File: 81 KB, 354x392, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19922295

>>19921660
Conversely, it means tons of bad shit.
- No vaccine all but confirmed
- Immunity lasts less than half a year from memory T-cells priming (because 11% of common cold cases are corona and thus virtually everyone would be immune otherwise)
-- Sub-point: the scam fake as shit artificial ab's created by so-and-so were stated to only last a week at most
- Treatment also all but never happening
- Alternatively to all the above, their so-called unexposed samples were contaminated (they do no tests on those samples, which were obtained prior to the wuhan flu).
The paper also shows that the unexposed group had orders of magnitude lower response in the AIM assays than the infected patients.

See the dashed line on pic rel? That's the limit of detection. Anything at or under this cannot be distinguished from 0. Though I prefer the stimulation index in S3.E, as it shows even more distinctively that the "quality" of the stimulation in supposedly non-wuflu samples is basically nothing at all. In conclusion, even if the data was correct (only 20 samples total, with some bias) and there was no contamination, that would mean that simply being exposed to a corona-based common cold would probably grant 0 immunity or even any kind of relief from the chink coof, even in that small subset of the population that may have the ab's.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]