/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17265755

>>12443884
Whale: 650MM
Others: inconsequential

>>12101653

Anon, do you get to pick which colors are available for each shirt style?

I would gladly buy a neon yellow shirt and/or jacket if it were available.

t. contractor anon

>>11969068
My dad is the President of Secure Decentralized Smart Oracles and he said it will be the next big thing. I don't know who to believe.

>>11612341
One billion tokens. A minuscule percentage of that in circulation. That's extremely bullish... right up until the rest of the tokens get dumped.

Also, if you can read a chart and have been paying attention, what's going on is very obvious.

>>11199999
>link is [the] shit
Agreed. Based.

>>11094009
>>11094280
Imagine not even looking at the URL of the link provided

>>11092548
I get my investment advice from a Laotian sandwich preparation board

>>11083888
WEw lad

>>9762444
c h e c k e d

he eats big macs all day whilst rory sucks him off

I would like to think that Sergey would find this one funny.

Digging through projects I’ve found FLASHcoin (https://www.flashcoin.io/).). I was looking at the github repository which looks absolutely shit to me. 5 of 7 repositories are forks. Not per se being a bad thing there are only about 2 commits changing some strings from the FLASHcoin dev team. The other repo is the website and the other is a web wallet, which you have to register with an email, like what the fuck. Now lets get to the dev-team itself, none of them has a own repository which is unusual and in general the team looks shite. I also took a look at the Travis CI running the tests. I found a warning saying „uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1). The next thing is the whitepaper, which uses a bunch of buzzwords and not very much technical content. They claim that they have reached 25000Tx/s and with minor changes will be able to scale up to 200000. It’s even written somewhere that they own the mining pool. I proceeded to google Chris and found this blog post about a previous company he owned having encryption problems: http://cryto.net/~joepie91/blog/2014/04/19/why-you-should-stay-away-from-unseen.is/.. My main question is: is that an intended scam or is this just a really really really bad project. Please only respond if you're invested in ChainLink as it is a measure of intelligence.

>>8377643
WE WUZ BULLS N SHIET

this entire thread makes me hard

>>8204750
Relax bro. I used to hold LINK, and I sold it in order to trade shitcoins and accumulate more ETH before buying back in, which I did yesterday. The entire time I was horrified I'd be bagholding some shitcoin and LINK would moon for some reason.

Now I feel comfy as fuck knowing I have my LINK.

>>8187874
Bump.