/biz/ - Business & Finance

Good night link marines.
When I wake up to $6.50 linkies I will hit the snooze button knowing the swing linkers are on suicide watch.

>>14464018

Currently 30% of the total LINK supply is held by Sergey (350M out of 1B total supply).
Realistically what's stopping Sergey from selling tomorrow? With only 350M in circulation a sell-off like that would kill the price.

$1000 or no sell

>>14428568

>>14272477
all in link

>>14208098
>>14208084
>>14208067

*ahem*
gentlemen, it's come to my attention that some people here have been selling
well, I've been thinking about it lately, and you know what...
>FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS

>>14199515
>Nope, minimum $100
imagine falling for this FUD

>>14198677
>well intentioned post
you're a mess OP
an absolute mess

>>14196802

>>13721162

$1K EOY

>>11601086
Come @ me bro !

>>10838979
I won't neither.
So should you.
We should all keep as much Link out of circulation as possible to force the mother of all fomos.

$2ish after mainnet
$8ish one year later
.....
$80ish 4-5 years later
....
Golden bull 10ish years later.
Praise him !

>>9511037
It had a spike minutes ago.
And then a quick backtrack..
Man, just seems like there are hundreds of holders who stay with their fingers ready to push the sell button.
Feels fucking horrible..
Will hodl my 15k stack though..
Maybe in few years CL will find a use as oracle for automated McDonalds casheers and go to $2..
Who can tell..

Am in jail unirobically
50%Omg
25%Link
25%Req
But don't take my advice though.
Also you should better say
>If you were in a coma till..
Jailtime ain't funtime
Peace

>>9443309
Lmaoooo !
Rubini blown the fuck out of the economy !!!
Future is crypto !

Untill $100

>>9298853
Pic related.
Now gtfo !

The Revolution is fucking here !
Tfw won't sell at $1k.
Maybe at $10k will sell some.

Besides tons of money, we will have made a lot of frens.
Link $790 eoy !

The way they provide data to the Blockchain is by accepting calls on a centralized API. So data requests to the Blockchain have to originate off-chain. Its solution is poor compared to what MOBI is planning for their initial implementation IMO. LINK implementation has a lot to be desired in my opinion. I agree with the people who say they're trying to do too much.

To expand on what I said, my personal issue with LINK is their API:
https://www.smartcontract.com/

To buy data and create an Ethereum contract to use it, you need to go a centralized API. In practice, this means that even though the data retrieval is decentralized, the management of that data is completely centralized.

Mobius will be completely different. To request the data, it can originate from on-chain or off-chain. The API for requesting the data is also each individual node, which then propagates that request across the network. So even though Mobius will have a centralized FE which makes it easy for people to use it, it means that the requesting of the data and the management of it all, is completely decentralized.

Also keep in mind that the retrieval of data into Ethereum is just one aspect of Mobius, the aspect included in the initial implementation. There's also BTC/Hyperledger and what MOBI can do there, The BTC/Hyperledger functionality will be completely different to that, and creates a whole new aspect not yet seen in any other Oracle projects at all.
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top
Update Auto
0 / 0 / 1 / 2

[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

About • Feedback • Legal • Contact