/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58190951
>>58191084
>>58191145
You guys who never pay taxes on your crypto and then decide to cash out into your KYC'd bank account blows my fucking mind.
I've been paying my crypto taxes since 2017. Have NEVER. EVER had an issue. And I've deposited over 200k in random lump sums. Never had to call or anything.
I also subscribe to coinbase one so that might help? But even before then I never had an issue.
Some people are just not too bright I guess

>>56319865
son of a bitch

>>56299118
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it, anon?

>>53332175
He's the antichrist for Link Marines

The cherry on top of the cake is that NEXO isn't even responsible for the shitty price performance of Chainlink. It's simply Sergey dumping 140 million tokens on those cuck retail faggots

>>53226572
kikes are just a part of the bigger picture, the endgame is ushering in a global government and a world leader (aka the antichrist) as prophesized in Revelations.

There are plenty of goyim working at the top levels who are just regular freemasons doing the dirty work. Also lots of useful idiots too

>ITT coping bagholders hoping for a bullrun during a recession + global inflation scenario
I knew you guys were retarded but you exceeded my expectations

>>53213152
I made 21% off my stack by swing trading after staking was released.

That's 4 years of staking...how does that make you feel?

I shorted this pump, what am i in for?

>>53163878
Because I fell for the triple digit meme and the retarded schizoid bagholder nonsense on here.

The fact that this piece of shit has been underperforming the entire market since August 2020 should have been enough for me to sell....but here we are. I regret not dumping everything

bump

>>53133954
Denial

There has been no capitulation yet, plenty of retarded smug mumus that celebrate a +2% pump

>>53132741
My plan B is Bitcoin and renting out my home

That's it

>>53131786
>Bitcoin goes up +1%
>smug bottom posters arrive
This is how I know we are still crabbing for atleast 6 months

>>53129279
>no risk
>gave away his crypto
stakers literally have monkey tier IQ

>>53120415
I'm about to rent my apartment in London for 2800 pounds per month

>>53122229
>implying the retarded wagie that answers your calls is able to unfreeze your account

>>53118795
rabbis wouldn't buy your digital ponzi scheme

>>53118739
why would a nigger rob my ethereum? Does he know ETH has now transitioned to PoS and is a scam?

>>53118266
Bitcoin had it's chance to prove itself to be an actual decentralized currency which isn't impacted or influenced by the FED and other central banks policies.

Unfortunately they managed to tame it with ETFs....it's beyond demoralizing seeing it follow boomer markets and tanking when this faggot speaks

>>53088377
we were lying

>>53087477
>MUH MEANINGLESS DATA
We only care about the price nigger, keep your CLL infographic to yourself

>>53072019
stakers = cuck0lds of crypto

>>53003621
After roughly 4-5 months.

I usually cashed out 5-6k per withdrawal every 10-15 days. I explicitly did that to avoid making a huge withdrawal and getting red flagged immediately, also because the bullrun was ongoing and I didn't want to cash out everything in the midst of it.

It generally depends on the bank though, some banks are crypto friendly others simply don't want anything to do with it. But yeah I was pissed as fuck when they froze my account because I had all my trades to show them about how I bought Bitcoin in 2017/2018...but they simply didn't care

>>52991351
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons.