/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9906864
This

>>8974109
Segwit was a soft-fork, not a hard-fork, sorry sweetie

>>8974119
lmao I don't give a shit about your marketing script pajeet-kun. You claimed hard-forks are often used, and that's true, but contentious forks are not. Contentious forks are very dangerous for a coin and risk destroying the protocol (which is what bitcoin cash tried to do).
>as long as it remained a non-essential opt-in
Segwit is opt-in, that's what soft-forks are, my cuck friendo. You can still use BTC without using Segwit, you are just butthurt because Jihan ran out of money to bribe crypto companies from enabling it and it keeps going up in use.