/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21638306
This is dotcom 2.0. Useless tech booms for being innovative, then becomes something useful.
The missing LINK of blockchain technology has been found and a new golden age is about to begin as the niche cryptocurrency space explodes into the omni-cryptoeconomy. We're all going to make it.

>>21403795
I suppose, if your ICO was some ($name)coin that did nothing but be a slightly different bitcoin with nothing but a white paper. 2017 ICOs that had real use cases (read - DeFi ones) had a speculative bubble before their product was ready, and now that they're functional they're climbing to ATH and beyond. The comparison you should be making here is to the dotcom bubble. You could easily have seen the previous crash then and guesses it would happen again. But it never did. That's because bad tech companies went under and the ones that remained or otherwise appeared afterwards were finally starting to put out working products rather than promises.