/biz/ - Business & Finance

What is going to prevent pic related from happening and therefore ruining your ass in court due to a bunch of NEETs/bots manipulating the majority vote because TLDR?

There is a reason why the court system exists, and why we need PROFESSIONALs to represent not some autists judging "subjective" cases on the internet / LARPing as insurance/business/transport experts, then hoping your ass that game theory will make them choose the most rational decision.

If you get the majority vote wrong, you lose your "streak" and PNK you stake. Trusting simple yes/no decisions on subjective cases that require multiple viewpoints from expert analysis is retarded as well as when one party REEEEs and pay extra arbitration fees for more jurors to rejudge the case in their favor.

Again there is a reason why the real court system gives pay equally and does not incentivize jurors / coerce them to make the majority vote for the "best judgement" when cases can be adjourned or if both parties can be at fault in the court system. The reason the judge is there is to cut the bullshit between both parties and review each side in detail and make proper judgement with their extensive knowledge of the law. If you lose the judge you'll have either party lying their ass off on the contract and internet larpers/bots using their "best judgement" of the pile of horseshit.

Also
>future work does not mention its weight as a valid judgement over the modern court system except "muh there are too many cases/its too expensive and complicated!" and what they will do to address them.
>no roadmap
>90% of problems in transportation/insurance/ecommerce can be easily solved with Chainlink smart contracts. I have no idea why they label such issues as "subjective" as you can track packages with real world data and such big ecommerce/insurance/transport companies will obviously refund you due to their inherent policies, keeping customer satisfaction, and profit margins.
>spanish ceo and ¿literally who team?