[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.19353183 [View]
File: 298 KB, 273x350, 1406288408806.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19353183

Even though i have more money than all of my peers my age [ 29 ], they had a decade of driving nice cars, living in their own apartments, taking their girlfriends/wives out to exotic locations and traveling.

Money is not everything - I'm betting on exponential growth, but sometimes I imagine what my life would have been like just being a normal hedonistic debt fueled normie.

>> No.17520459 [View]
File: 298 KB, 273x350, 1582600140881.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17520459

Not exactly the place to ask, but I'd like t hear /smg/'s opinion on something.
We're hearing a lot of "billionaires shouldn't exist" stuff from the modern left in the West, but as far as I can see, billionaires only exist because that is the upper limit of the system under which we operate. Am I right?
Doing away with private billionaires would mean reorganising the global financial system in such a way as to prevent that much money/ net worth from being accrued by an individual. Would that not simply mean that each unit of currency becomes worth more, meaning billionaires become millionaires, but maintain proportional wealth?
The only other option I can see would be straight up communism.
Any alternatives, or is that it?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]