/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9610707
> Thats actually interesting, do you have any pre-bcash fork sources to prove it?
Prove what, exactly? and Bcash isn't a fork, it's a Bitcoin Cash full node implementation, so I'm not sure what you actually mean here.
> Also what arguments are used against increasing block size in bitcoin "core"?
They have used dozens, none of them are at all even *vaguely* true, except this one;
1) If the on chain throughput is increased, people running non mining nodes on $30 hardware will not be able to validate blocks in real time.
Which is somewhat true (actually not even really because you can run with 8mb blocks just fine using an rpi) but completely irrelevant, because the intended configuration at scale was for end users to use SPV wallets, which is what everyone uses on thin client devices at any rate, and none of those give the vaguest fuck about block size.