/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30446016
BSV is superior, but craig is a fucking FAGGOT and tarnishes everything

>>30191203
Kinda feels like you're the one doing the mental gymnastics here.
Craig IS Satoshi, and if you don't like it, STIFF.

>>30129111
Checked.

>>29984709
That's right but technically they had to strip all the BTC and BCH changes to get it back to the 2009 protocol.

>>29938820
>moneybutton
>AnyPay
>Veribit
>Handcash
>BuyBSV
>Fully scaled tokenized economy
>50k transactions processed per second
>Turing complete
>can do everything Core and ETH is faster and cheaper
>.0005c transaction fees
>fulfills use case(s) 90% of vapor ware shitcoins seek to provide
>infinite scaling
>actually useable as a currency
>fulfills description and vision as defined in Satoshi’s white paper
>BSV Video rentals
>blockchain storage / instantaneous data recall
>arcades w/ games hosted on the literal blockchain
>casinos that payout immediately to private wallets
Lolololol go shit in the street Faggot

>>29901514
2/3

In 2020, Tesla disclosed in a filing, which was made public in February 2021, to the SEC that it had acquired $1.5 billion worth of "bitcoin". It simply says "bitcoin", not BTC. I am inclined to believe that the Bitcoin purchased was BSV and not BTC. The reasons for this are as follows:
>Elon Musk as the founder of PayPal has intimate familiarity with the intricacies of running a payment network
>Tesla is building a fleet of autonomous cars
>That fleet needs a payment network for ride-hailing
>BSV can serve this need for this perfectly
>BTC cannot serve due to its by-design lack of scalability
>Elon Musk is known to despise the SEC and this would be a bit of a trolling of them.
>He changed his Twitter picture to the same stock image of a fork in a road as used in a 2017 article concerning protocol forking by Mike Hearn, an early Bitcoin developer who considered the project a "failed experiment" and left Bitcoin development in 2016 due to high fees.
>At the same time he also changed his profile bio to the phrase "meta fork". This follows a period where the bio read "bitcoin".
>"Metanet" refers to a value-based internet built on Bitcoin SV.
>He posted a reference to the scifi book Excession by Ian M. Banks. In this novel an OCP (outside-context-problem, something that falls outside of a culture's ability to deal with it due to being unexpected and novel), enters onto the scene and causes a great political and societal disruption.
For these reasons it seems that Tesla has purchased BSV.

2/3

Bitcoin BTC was hobbled and made unscalable by Blockstream at the behest of their investors, the Bilderberg group and MasterCard. The artificial blocksize limitation prevents the network from scaling and prevent it's use as peer-to-peer electronic cash. Bitcoin is also intended to be a fully scriptable and function as a decentralized programmable ledger, much like Ethereum, except much more scalable.

How scalable, you ask?
Enter BSV, the implementation of Bitcoin that follows the original protocol outlined in the whitepaper and thus scales extremely well. Bitcoin BSV has over ten thousand times lower fees than BTC, despite roughly the same number of daily transactions. This means sub-cent transaction fees. Bitcoin SV is also Turing Complete meaning it is programmable and anything that can be programmed onto Ethereum can be programmed onto Bitcoin, except for far cheaper. This enables Bitcoin BSV to be used as electronic cash and as well as automated micropayments for an "internet-of-things".

1/2

In the last 24 hours both BSV and BTC did about 300k transactions.

The average transaction fee on BTC was $26.16
https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee#:~:text=Average%20Bitcoin%20transaction%20fees%20can,from%200.6796%20one%20year%20ago.
The average transaction fee on BSV was $0.00095
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin%20sv/

BSV has superior scaling capabilities and fees low enough that it can actually be used as electronic cash, which if you recall is the title of the Bitcoin whitepaper:
>Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Why are people using an inferior technology when the superior solution is right in front of us?

Oh and here's a fun challenge: try to answer without ad hominem attacking CSW (because that's completely irrelevant to the fees being 26000 times lower)

>>29735475

And what about BCH? They don't have segwit.

>>29553158
BTC is pets.com
BSV is amazon.com
Get fucked poorfag

>>29528231
We are just here to spread the truth and laugh at the cope.

>>29451243
Shiny boomer rocks are so comfy fren holding them in your hand is unlike anything else
>>29451431
Kek not wrong
>>29451067
The more you know anon
>https://coingeek.com/elon-musk-would-hate-bsv/

>>29392734

>>29392426
He never bought Bitcoin Core. SEC filing literally says he bought BitCoin. Get fucked

>>29367777
Bsv flippening inbound. Prepare your anuses newfags

>>29353666
THEY BOUGHT BitCoin, not the current BTC ticker but current BSV ticker.
You're literally fucked if you havent sold yet. All fiat withdrawals are paused. It's ogre

>>29355425
Imagine having such a large text and ignoring the text just before the one you marked.
>becomes the dominant payment system

only can provide that.

>>29296682
100% True
and Musk knows this