/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17612170
>If you’re buying link at this price you literally won’t make it.
kek gives you a greenID and this is how you show gratitude?
you better watch your step boy...we don't cotton to FUDsters like you 'round these parts

>>17612168
>Based 42 absolutely BTFOing the best FUD I'd seen in a few months.
thank you
someone had to do it since there were no good replies to the FUD last night that it got me thinking.
but yeah that is the best FUD regarding chainlink, I can't think of any other realistically believable FUD at this point.
Glad to know that we've beaten even the potential for metaphysical/alternate timeline FUD haha

>>17336948
>Just sexist sjw bullshit that would allow someone like her to get the internship in the first place.
she's studying computer science, not that big of a stretch to apply for a chainlink internship
that goes for all people reading this
if you think you could be helpful to the team, you should definitely apply:
https://careers.chain.link/

>>17335590
>Redpill me on energy grid applications
it's to do with stabilizing the electrical grid
with Europe and other countries moving away from nuclear and coal. As they do this, the grid experiences more volatility and fluctuations, especially as they onload "renewable energy sources" such as solar, wind, etc.

energy grid fluctuations leads to frequency drops/spikes and that leads to bad quality power being delivered to end-users

through my career in engineering consulting, my company already has some projects ongoing related to grid stabilization (won't disclose details) and I would like to approach the chainlink team eventually to assist in implementing this technology and integrating it with our equipment

to be honest, I would look to retain Jonny Huxtable's linkpool team for technical assistance

>>17172876
>HR roasties don't give a shit, they pounce as soon as they sense weakness.
s'true
they don't know you and don't need you, you need them and they know it
therefore expect them to enjoy having that (((power))) over you
react accordingly

also a good article:
https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-or-the-office-according-to-the-office/