/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49996349
>fee would be without all those emissions
That's not how it works, fees on eth wouldn't be cheap if the supply inflated by 100%
High inflation is important for security, which is then driving value, mostly well over 3x.
Even still, Avax had 70% inflation last year
>>49992761
I am not a fag boy
>even though most do fucking kek
It's absurd to support atomic instant one block pee pee poo poo cross chain
Most do support 2pc which is also what Pact can do
>>49992962
soon TM
>>49995346
/thread

>>49992648
>So let me get this straight. It's like Bitcoin blockchain but instead of increasing the block size they'd rather add another chain
Much like L2 or and other Sharding design ever proposed. If you don't understand why this isn't big blocks just go and buy boomer stocks
>But there is a different token balance on each chain
Much like L2 or and other Sharding design ever proposed.
>and there is a limited way for the chains to communicate with each other via Pact.
You literally have no idea what limited means, just because it can't do something that no other scalable platform can do doesn't mean it's limited. Let me repeat, no scalable platform will ever allow for this type of transaction (a atomic tx with no extra steps)
Other than literally doing magic, it's one of the best languages for DeFi and cross chain executions.
>to allow for Defi smart contracts or is this an absolute limitation?
It already allows for complex defi smart contracts
>Do you think Pact can be improved
abso-fucking-lutely, most anons here talked to the lead dev of Pact and they know that there is a lot to improve. It's their whole job.
One example would be to allow for different syntax so it's more like python than lisp

>>49581053
Counter it? Why should I counter a piece of art? How would you counter pic related