/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13069359

That's just a personal attack. Nothing interesting to address here, so I'll take the opportunity to post a photo of Synth and McAfee instead.

>>12890866

> Claiming that ‘obelisk totally exists cos synth says it does and it’s coming soon!’ is not a debunking of the very clear fact that there is no consensus.

You're getting confused between consensus and block writing. Block writing is not decentralized yet because only the masternode writes blocks. But that doesn't mean there is no consensus. There is distributed consensus because the immutable ledger is replicated across thousands of nodes, creating a consensus as to the state of the blockchain. That's literally what consensus is - an agreement on the state of the blockchain.

> Obviously mcafee was paid.

Post proof. Both McAfee and Skycoin said he wasn't paid. Why lie? McAfee has been quite open about it in the past when he got paid to promote coins.

> You are actually delusional if you think that the man would get a Skycoin tattoo for free.

You're delusional to think McAfee needs money so badly that he'd get a tattoo for cash.

> The skyminer may have had a rebate in sky but the value of sky was fixed when it was near all time high.

Incorrect. Those who purchased the first batch of Skyminers actually saw the value of their Skycoin increase. They could have sold at the peak for a profit. Those who purchased the second batch did get rekt though, but that's just the bear market, not Skycoin's fault. If they'd put the money into any other coin they'd still have been rekt.


Anyway, this is better. Good to see some actual attempts at FUD starting to flow through. We'll update SkyFUD.com as necessary to cover any new points.