/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30192932
I was thinking it looked more like someone photo swapped their faces. Still confused.

>>29509394
they got helped by parsiq.

>>29373733
that seems really good, why arent we mooning?
>inb4 people dont know
no, there is probably some undefined reason left before we can take off, is it how much demand there is for the usecase of the token?

>>29305297
why hasnt he just moved coins from one of his old wallets then? seems easy enough to prove that he is satoshi.

what's a good ratio for PRQ/DEXG folio? 50/50 or 66/33? please share your thoughts.

>>27247595
>>27247784
...so what's the point of holding? just speculative investment?

>>26023699
How does the CB wallet keep fees low? What's the catch?

>>22855611
why would you want to buy a "scam" at the bottom? a scam means you lose your money.

>>21887453
>ingen familj
vad menas? jag har ju familj här och kan ju inte be dem att dra utomlands i ett år för att jag ska kunna smita skatter, eller läser jag detta fel?

>>21781407
isnt jealousy being afraid that someone may take what belongs to you while envy is desiring what someone else has? wouldnt they only be experiencing envy if that is the case?

>>20707666
That's 38K UNi-V2 tokens. The redeemed liquidity tokens that one receives for providing liquidity to Uniswap.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x18267918cd3fd4f40ae67c278a24e3a9a888d836
This is the liquidity lock transaction. Notice the worth of the tokens.
This is the lockup on unicrypt
https://www.unicrypt.network/pol-dapp/0x18267918cD3fd4f40ae67c278a24e3A9a888D836

>>19892024
>>19892070
>>19892080
might be best to wait until the BAL devs add the one click add liquidity button, they will probably finish it this week so it wont be long.

>>19729404
what is DIA?

>>19716857
?

>>19697204
didnt this pasta have 260k liquidity just a few days ago?

>>19680329
like access to the pool where they collect fees maybe? or something like that.

>>19491056
hmmmmm this seems fishy... does he care about my future or not?

>>19090051
i dont trust that link

>>18804467
kapeesh?

the poo id is generally bad since it tells you there are a lot of pajeets in the thread thanks to keks benevolence. but in PNK threads it feels like its kek blessing us idk.

>>17966265
hmmm, yes its decided, OP is a massive faggot

What's the correlation between a +% and a -% it's not 1 on 1 obviously, because you can't go lower then -100%.

Is there a math formula for this?

BTC or XMR?