[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.15712621 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, 1563962531138.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15712621

>> No.10213935 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10213935

>>10213878
Confirmation. Anybody that cant see the importance of Link to Swift is blind.

>> No.10063203 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10063203

>>10063045
It means if you were smart enough to build a stack, and to add to it right now at these prices. you are going to be blessed in a big way.. IMO, not a matter of if, a matter of when. You know who SWIFT was referring to in the attached right?

>> No.10061712 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, strategic priority from SWIFT.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10061712

Big business is scared of getting rolled over by competition and within big business, the group who feels most threatened is the bank messaging collective still relying on fax machines. (SWIFT)
They still want to stay in this race of rapidly changing technology and stay relevant. They have become used to being the standard. What do they do? Make another standard and make sure everyone important is in on the ground level, in exchange for free access to the elite club through a few million LINK tokens OTC, via Sergey & Co and his solution.
What do they gain? A solution that will improve efficiency and 15% or more on operating costs. Run a node and get on board the decentralized network.
Market makers/traders usually look for an “edge” or advantage over others. The LINK network is their edge. Microsoft, Salesforce, SWIFT member banks, and the guys who were winning for decades win out and stay on top.

>> No.10050055 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10050055

>>10049844
This is nothing new, it was flat out obvious when the attached comments were made a few months back as Swift completed their test. Of course they are referring to Link, most likely Swift owns a huge portion of the company.

>> No.9700312 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9700312

>>9700270
Swift is going to make sooo much money with the assistance of Link.

>> No.9613811 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9613811

>>9613731
I think that comment in the paragraph of the attached is HUGE. I am sure you know the part I am referring to.

>> No.9092740 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092666

>> No.9092646 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092618

>> No.8816800 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8816800

>>8815757
Have hin look up Swift .. to understand what they do, then share the info below taken directly from the results of their recent blockchain project. Note that last comment about "3rd party" vendors.

>> No.8698610 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8698610

>>8698501

>> No.8698199 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8698199

>>8698104

>> No.8552637 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8552637

>>8550656
Having a tough time when the execs at SWIFT are calling their test a success, and the use of third parties in the future, a bad thing for Chainlink. This thread is all FUD.

>> No.8548424 [View]
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8548424

>>8548371
"third parties" .. IMO very bullish for Chainlink but DYOR

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]