/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9589686
>There is already an abundance of food in this country, some people go hungry because they're brainlets but there are still soup kitchens. But the main problem is inflation causing food prices to go up.
You do know that when there is inflation, that means that printed money is going somewhere and that someone is buying goods and services with that money right? Do you want a hint as to where that money is going? Worker wages have not kept pace with inflation. But the S&P500 has beat inflation. There is your answer. It's the bourgeoisie that is benefiting from this money printing. Not the workers. Follow the money. It works every time.

>There is. Government boosts the price of houses with central banking so it's very difficult for poorer people to afford them.
And who is benefiting from this money printing? The bourgeoisie. See a pattern? You ancaps say "but crony capitalism!" But the rich are actively bribing politicians in their favour. The bourgeoisie are our enemies. We should strip away their power not give them even more power.

>Everyone USED to have healthcare, back when there was a free market, see my previous post.
If health insurance in the US in the 50s/60s (which you considered the pinnacle) was so great, why was the life expectancy in the US for white males only 67.55 years in 1959-1961 (Mad Men era you love so much)? https://www.infoplease.com/us/mortality/life-expectancy-age-1850-2011

>>8532095
We are always right. The only people that vehemently defend capitalism are those that have a stake in it. most people have no stake in it but the elites have gotten very good at convincing the retard masses they do have a stake in it.

>>8222013
Don't choke on you ceo's doc martens there, wagecuck!

>>939615
>Thanks to the innovations brought forth by capitalism. Subsistence farmers in some african hellhole are still a few centuries back.
>Yes but that worker who left could start his own business if he's so dissatisfied.
are you gonna ever stop dodging my points

>They've made things better for their own country. Why do they have any obligation to make it better for africans or south-east asians? Why can't africans or south-east asians make things better for themselves?
Because they are using them to enrich themselves, while making things much worse for those in the third world, that is what imperialism is all about (see the posts earlier about the IMF and such). And it isn't just western capitalists that are the problem. The "third world" has its own capitalists which are oppressing the workers there, keeping them from "making things better for themselves"

>A lot of people have good wages. You don't actually need a lot of money to live well.
The cost of living has continued to rise, but wages have not, so bullshit.

> you can make it work with minimum wage for a while
see above point

> This is under the assumption that your job is only a temporary thing until you move on to something better. People forever on minimum wage are idiots and there's no helping them no matter what.
So anyone, anytime, could get a better job that pays higher than min wage, or just "work harder"?

>>939839
nice, take what i said out of context
great refutation