/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4503725
If you accept the mainstream derping about "banking the unbanked" (which itself is just a PR ruse of the USG's to get their fingers into the blockchain), you'll find yourself wanting to do something stupid about minimum transaction values in the bitcoin network. Once you reduce the minimum fee for broadcasting, a whole slew of smaller transactions will want into each block. That demand will put upward pressure on the price each transaction must pay for inclusion into each 1MB block, pressure that can only be alleviated by increasing the maximum block size. So there you have it: the USG is exploiting your kindhearted desire to make the world a better place for someone to whom you're entirely unrelated to fuck up the blockchain.

>>4500065
Why do summefags like you assume that being against Gavin's blocksize increase USG agenda means you are pro-Blockstream as a result?

Bitcoin cannot be decentralized for the poor. Not with second layers, and even worse, not with on-chain transactions, if you knew anything about economy, game theory and thermodynamics you would know.

Bitcoin is not for niggers to transact coffees over it. If you can't afford transactions, fuck off. The people that matter in Bitcoin (the ones with the most BTC) will not allow Bitcoin to be ruined so idiots can transact their bullshit on it. The sooner you understand this, the sooner you will either give up or try getting rich so you actually matter in Bitcoin.

If you accept the mainstream derping about "banking the unbanked" (which itself is just a PR ruse of the USG's to get their fingers into the blockchain), you'll find yourself wanting to do something stupid about minimum transaction values in the bitcoin network. Once you reduce the minimum fee for broadcasting, a whole slew of smaller transactions will want into each block. That demand will put upward pressure on the price each transaction must pay for inclusion into each 1MB block, pressure that can only be alleviated by increasing the maximum block size. So there you have it: the USG is exploiting your kindhearted desire to make the world a better place for someone to whom you're entirely unrelated to fuck up the blockchain.

>>4503617
>>4503628
Go to bed, Roger.

If you accept the mainstream derping about "banking the unbanked" (which itself is just a PR ruse of the USG's to get their fingers into the blockchain), you'll find yourself wanting to do something stupid about minimum transaction values in the bitcoin network. Once you reduce the minimum fee for broadcasting, a whole slew of smaller transactions will want into each block. That demand will put upward pressure on the price each transaction must pay for inclusion into each 1MB block, pressure that can only be alleviated by increasing the maximum block size. So there you have it: the USG is exploiting your kindhearted desire to make the world a better place for someone to whom you're entirely unrelated to fuck up the blockchain.

Go to bed, Roger.

>>4344513
>not wanting Bitcoin centralized by communists automatically means you support Core

Roger, go to bed.

>>4322521
>>4322576
Go to bed, Roger.

Go to bed, Roger.

Go to bed, Roger.

>satoshi's vision

>>4177144
Go to bed, Roger.

>>4127084
>chinkmined big blocks crap developed by idiots
Go to bed, Roger.

>>4084623
>literally describes Dogecoin
Go to bed, Roger.

>>4073905
Roger Ver is on suicide watch along with the bagholders that he scammed lol.

Who will be the next forktard to die in "suspicious conditions"?

I'll say Barry Shillbert is trying really hard.

>>3659476
This. OP thinks this is reddit. Keep posting altfork propaganda and you'll end up doxed and buried.

>>3608357

>>3583068
You know that BCash is a scam?

>>3442073
You have to go back.

Daily reminder that TMSR browses this board, and if you try to shill your shitcoin hardfork of choice, the consequences will be fatal.

Remember, this is not Reddit. If you like playing with fire, then go on.