/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23530231
Try showing him something like this and explain to him that using hydrogen to power vehicles is much less efficient than just taking energy from the grid and storing it in a battery.

>>20817293
They are going to try to produce battery electric trucks as well but then they're competing against all the major truck manufacturers and TSLA and they're not doing anything in house so they're going to get ruined. It's like trying to hire someone to make you a Tesla at a better price than what they sell them at.
>>20817356
The problem isn't hydrogen itself, it's that powering anything from hydrogen is retarded because you're using more energy just to feed a battery which then powers the electric motor when you could just increase the size of the battery and do away with the rest of the system.

>>20123513
Yes, it's very inefficient if you're creating hydrogen from renewable energy. On top of this the fueling stations are 10-30k each compared to cheap electric chargers that can be placed almost anywhere. It's funny that people think a shitty TSLA knockoff can make hydrogen a real replacement to internal combustion engines when Toyota has been trying to do that since 1992.

>>20021530
They were originally only going to make hydrogen fuel cell vehicles but they realized that their hydrogen meme marketing is eventually going to fail so they're now claiming they're going to produce a battery electric semi on top of the hydrogen one and that these technologies are somehow not competing against each other. It's very inefficient to make hydrogen from renewable resources and you would just be better off using a battery and electric motor. This is just the tip of the NKLA bullshit iceberg.
>>20021547
I've never owned any NKLA. I was going to buy it for the pump and dump but I didn't want to get burned. A 20 billion dollar market cap for a company that only has prototypes and drawings of vehicles they say they are going to get other companies to produce for them. When Tesla was at that market cap, they were producing tens of thousand of cars a year and everyone thought they were going to fail.
>>20021573
>didn’t have an international deal
What deals do they have? You keep saying that they're going to become popular for commercial deliveries and so far you've referenced three cars used for marketing purposes and no real orders. The Solo has been out since 2018, why aren't companies buying them?
>Not a pumper, I bought in at 2.8 on the first big leg up.
Oh come on, you're going to sell moment SOLO reaches $5 and all the shit you've been saying in support of it will instantly evaporate as you find something else to try to pump.
>Good luck with your 6 Tesla shares
Terrible reading retention but okay. 6 TSLA share will be enough to buy one of these Solo meme cars, not that I would be that retarded.