/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55563718
>I’ve heard William is more level headed
It seems like it yeah. I can't recall a single scandal concerning him, and he isn't shilling the globohomo agenda either. He seems to enjoy a "simple" life of being happy with his waifu and kids.

>can’t the fucking king of a country have some self preservation for his people?
Just like his father (who wished to be reborn as a virus to decimate mankind), Charles despise mankind to the highest degree. He's part of this inbred clan of neomalthusians who believe social darwinism should be the end goal to reduce population, and other humans are only here to serve them. You should listen to the interviews his main valet gave about him, it's unreal. Like, he have valets to brush his teeth, tie his shoes, wipe his ass (groom of the stool), clean his ears, etc.. It's unreal how inapt he is. So no wonder they end up believing they are gods on earth and we aren't better than slaves.

And chosing Charles III as monarch's name isn't innocent at all. The previous two were absolute tyrants who imposed absolutism by divine right. Actually it was so bad Charles I ended up being beheaded because of how tyrannical he was, while Charles II was poisoned. Both with the reputation of being among the very worst monarchs of England.

Both kings despised the commoners, their ruling by divine right was allowing any excess on their end, but no fun allowed for the pleb. They started bloody wars for petty reasons and self-enrichment. They only valued their own lives.

To chose a name like this, Charles III is sending a clear message : "i'm here by divine right and you are only here to obey. You killed my ancestors by two times, but here i come again to take revenge in their name."

And it's no threats to take lightly, the british royal family is among the richest dinasty still alive, alongside the Sauds and the Rothschilds.