/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12826847

>>12809450

Do you realize how stupid you sound? "Contracts" that describe how parties "should" interact. So it's a supposed contract that tells human entities what they should do. Do they have to do it? No. They can just refuse.

"Live contracts" are nothing more than a glorified set of unenforceable instructions. Claiming they're "Smart contract 2.0" is a whole new tier of brainlet.

>>12799371
Imagine being so based you know you can be taken seriously from your own kitchen. BTFO LTOfags.

>>12788703

This.

Quant is the one for me by a mile. I've never seen potential like it.

OWN seems decent if they can get around the regulatory hurdles.

LTO is just dogshit. Pic related.

>>12763792

>>12746159

>>12733542

>> similar project in terms of its feel and professionalism

>>12728512

>>12723190

It's not a big deal. It's nothing new. It's nothing special.

Just read that sentence posted from their Medium article:

"LTO Network’s infrastructure allows different parties, with competing economic and/or political interests, to work within the same processes without the need to trust one another or a third party.""

Just breathe and take in how little that actually means. They are vaguely describing blockchain in general. That's it.

The only reason I'd actually consider buying LTO is because there are clearly enough stupid people buying that you might be able to make some profit.

>>12722452

Most of the "contracts" are dated from before LTO Network even existed you autist.

But yeah man, they seem like professional guys you can trust.

>>12721527
>>12721614
kys faggot

>>12721131

>>12720632

>> new paradigm

>>12713799

>>12713129

>>12711908

>> 5000 followers with only 400 token holders

>> 100% pajeet comments

Yeah these guys are obviously 100% legit and wouldn't ever try to make things sound better than they are or anything.