/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15040829
>he doesn't know

>>14958774
No thanks, I make my financial decisions based on doubles, triples and dank memes

>>14947688
Basically a couple of literal whos doing low-level grunt work at Google and Oracle decided to buy LINK then pump it with some vague blogposts hinting at a future possible usage of Chainlink by said companies

>>14940198
Trading competition ends on the same day as Openlaw news release.

>>14858817
Basically, they're all Jewish scams. Except for crypto.

>>14849153
1 LINK = 1 LINK

>>14837452
>those were your words not mine
>>14837125
>blocking crypto trade = stock market goes to zero and the entire american economy grinds to a fucking halt
>>14837037
>top kek if you actually think they would.
>>14836674
>lol brainlets, they control the telecoms they can block all crypto trade in the blink of an eye

there we go
the comment chain for all to see

you were quoting >>14837037 and then proceeded to set up a strap man and green-text summarize his comment

now you say those are my words...
everything okay big guy? are you sure you're not lost and just simply wandered into this thread and this forum?

>>14828659
kek. mods=gods. imagine buying LINK when you could be buying LINK

>>14809632
I bought because:
>CHANCE of a 100x+
>it uses Chainlink
>sticks it to the (((federal reserve))) and (((inflation)))
>it's cheap because it's complicated and nobody understands it yet
>actually accelerated the release of RSV from initial roadmap, while most projects delay for fucking years
>42 bought it

>>14756761
Bitfinex, unironically.

>>14695538
it's just a meme.

>>14636127
Sauce?

>>14627220
I think I'm starting to get it. The whitepaper is incredibly complicated, I've been researching it on and off for a couple weeks now

>>14603454
Intuition is the greatest tool in the crypto market. If you're not a naturally talented trader, you're going to get rekt no matter what model you're using.

>>14583397
>loses 20k on some shitty scam exchange
>can't even properly explain how
>I'm the retarded one
Google drive links can easily be set to harvest personal data about me.

>>14563383
haha love the pic

>>14458853
Try:
>hypnosis
>pay someone to find it - there are guys who specialize in finding lost BTC wallets from broken hard drives
>SEMAX and NSI-189 to fix your brain

>>14430897
By now it has become clear to most bizraelites that markets always move in the direction of maximum pain. However, I am not sure what that means for the LINK price in the short to medium term. I could see this going one of two ways:
1. We dump down to $2 or even lower in order to shake out redditors and nulinkers, and make them scared to buy in
2. We pump extremely hard from here to $10+, never to return, in order to price newfags out of buying even a 1k suicide stack
What do you think is more likely?

How long until there are trusted institutions that will safeguard our LINK stacks? All this cold wallet and trezor bullshit won't save you if someone breaks into your house and starts peeling off your fingernails until you give up the private key. This is unironically something to worry about when LINK hits $100+

>>14331325
LINK/USDT. Notice how LINK is the only coin right now that is inversely correlated with bitcoin - when BTC goes up, LINK goes down, and vice versa.

>>14321673
if you have to ask, you're never gonna make it

Would it be theoretically possible to create a stablecoin that is as untraceable as XMR? I could think of many uses for this.

>>14296835
https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-to-bring-benefits-of-gpi-to-dlt-and-trade-ecosystems

Anyone know where I can find out more about "gpi Link"? Is this their chainlink implementation or just a similarity in the name

>>14265347
Why would Oracle Corporation want to check the price of ETH from 3 different sources?