[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.30053695 [View]
File: 1.34 MB, 925x1164, 1614385076971.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30053695

205 EOD stable coin no dips
brap smell her asshole edition

>> No.30048915 [View]
File: 1.34 MB, 925x1164, 1614385076971.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30048915

>>30043696
none of that shit is true
if you are decently swole
females usually eyeball fuuck you its genetics and biology
then you get to coom inside their vaginas without a condom

>> No.29937231 [View]
File: 1.34 MB, 925x1164, 1600655982371.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29937231

>>29932946
dangerously based

>> No.29799385 [View]
File: 1.34 MB, 925x1164, 1594068201435.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29799385

>>29798863
The point of my post is explain why 33M short volume doesn't mean they have 78.5 float % more shorts at the end of the day, because a lot of those would be swing traded. so yeah plainly saying they added 78% to short float % is misguided.
but I'd say the complement might be true of the 11M the day before. By which I mean, in any given day a fraction of shorts will be long positions and the other will be swings; my guess is that the fraction on the day with 33M is majority swings, while the day with 11M is majority longs because the other option would be closing the positions at massive loss, since price only rose during the climb to +100%.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]