/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58459813
Over the last 3 years we've had nothing but confirmation after confirmation over what was speculated on back in 17/18. If we're being frank many people expected things to play out quicker, but many also didn't fully understand the entire task ahead of the team in order to finally scale adoption. To say that Chainlink isn't primed to be the value capture mechanism with the highest potential moving forward is just ignorant and ignores the wide scale dependency on Chainlink for industry standard multi-chain contracts. I've spent enough time talking to guys like you and the biggest similarity amongst you is that you fail to extrapolate the network effects of the services they are building given the publicly available information. In your world you just see a company making services that are foundational to the industry but don't see the network effects on price yet so you don't extend your logic to assume that it one day will. You see partnership after partnership but as long as you don't see products in production you assume there never will be. I thought that effort posting FUD was always bad faith, but what I've come to realize is that it takes a certain mind to be able to comfortably extend ones logic in order to see the inevitability of Chainlink's dominance. I don't think that you are a bad person, I think we are just not cut from the same cloth. Even if you were to read a well organized investment thesis covering all subjects related to Chainlink's potential value capture you'd still find yourself doubting something.

>>55795926
I remember reading this and feeling like it was detailed enough to be real but using just enough retard lingo to get people to not notice. Thanks insider anon.

I'm kind of starting to get it. Though I feel like this every time. So in making every backend zk compliant we are able to leverage all public/private data in order to take in enough context to make smart contracts which can execute given certain triggers. Thing is this anon >>53966157 brings up a good point. Taking his points into consideration, the Chainlink network is in fact worth the value of the contracts it is holding and this value will only be pushed into the token through natural market forces once the incentive systems are at play. Similar to how the dollar only keeps its value as a result of the US military and its petrodollar status. Anyways, given those facts this means the the TVS of Chainlink is a better measure of its value at any given time. This statement will only become more true as time goes on, and with the TVS of link being more closely tied to the value of the entire worlds contracts as a whole then doesn't this make LINK the only valid currency? Am I fucking retarded or is LINK literally going to be the globohomo currency which required some DID mark of the beast to be able to be used? Meaning you literally won't be able to live in this weird singularity we're headed towards unless you give up your entire being and its data/dna/info to be tracked/recorded at all times? Meaning Chainlink then takes enough context for an AI to figure out that its best use of this technology is to figure this out in reverse?
x = state at time T
f(x) = state at time T+1
Then repeats this indefinitely until we merge the data of every single interaction in the universe since its inception in order to reanimate every thing that has every lived and will live? The question isn't how do I profit from this, but why should I enter willingly and profit from this? Also does this mean that Chainlink is not just the global standard, but the interdimensional standard? How much does 1 billionth of the entire value of every interdimensional interaction costs?

>>28635777
CHECKED
GET THE FUCKING DIGITS CHECKED

Give me your price predictions longer term - any LINKies in this thing? Can it compare to the fundamentals??

>>23488877

I bought 7,35 LINK for 50€ yesterday and sold them for 63€ today. Thanks for the free 13€ guys. Gonna buy me some Subway with that FREE MONEY. hahaha.

I had a buyorder on Chainlink with 2500€ for the price of 6,66€ that I put in as a joke a few weeks ago. It actually triggered now what the fuck. Eather I have made a very good or a very bad deal now.

WWYD if LINK actually dropped all the way to $0.001

Would you buy more? Or would it get delisted?

>>22742746
cek

>>22711621
sieg heil nibba, where can i buy a linkpool share?

>>22397735
>>22397847
Doing God's work lads

>>22313576
Woah

>>22118993
People are going to start saying you should buy stuff. They're going to shill you their own investment, even if it happens to be a scamcoin. So please, before you start posting on here and attracting pajeets like flies to shit (somewhat ironically), go and DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

This info is all available on google/Youtube/wherever. At least go away and find out what crypto IS first before coming here.

Good luck anon.

>>21345666
HOLY CHECKED

>>20756213
It's finally happening, Chainlink is finding more and more real world use cases. If you sell anytime in the next 5 years I'm not sure you were ever meant to make it...

>>20350968
$1000 EOY

>>19780955
>So does that mean it already too late to invest in some stocks? I mean I already anticipated that the economic would bounce back. Some businesses got hit harder than others. I'm still not sure if it would have been a good idea to invest in any airplane lines if I could afford it. They'd come back, but not for a little while.

do we have anything to look forward to next year? whats the lifespan of CL? will it still be used 2040 and beyond?

thanks for visiting

>>19191596

pretty much this, nice post OP keep em' coming

>>18863547
What does his portfolio look like?

>>18325222
>>18325255
>>18325277
>>18325333

>>17938040
Hey 42, are you familiar with the work of John C. Lilly?