/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58369169
ya know as stupid as it seems there is a teeny tiny piece of me that thinks maybe all the Q Trump shit is still actually true and moass is intended to be the opening volley of the supposed massive operation. A way to financially cripple the opposition before the arresting commences.

>they're trying AMC #7
How are they this incapable of learning like this. Not the shills, those are just paid nobodies that phone it in. The people paying them. They do the exact same things, over and over and over to no effect. They never iterate or try a different approach or even make the slightest effort to make it less obvious. Just punching the brick wall over and over not even trying to look for a hammer. Utter fucking insanity. They're just so stupid.

buy in October and go away

i just realized that bobos are the incels of finance
it all makes sense now

>>56064537
current economic indicators point to limited volatility and gradual positive alpha
could it change in the future, sure
right now conditions are good
if it does change the move would be to limit risk while maintaining some possibility for gains

>>55915400
>I'm debating whether these companies they target are just stocked with hostile boards, because they seem to be doing this to a lot of companies while being incredibly sure that the companies would never do anything back.
They are. Remember how RC came in and kicked out the hostile board at GameStop, and how the screaming about rain cone in these threads increased a hundredfold after he fired Furlong and the jeet CFO?

>>54999020
I just thought of something. What if a halt automatically moves the transfer agent "operational efficiency" setting to 100% as a liquidity backstop? That would explain why all of these runups magically got shorted down without institutions pumping up the number of shares actually on loan. That would explain why they hate heat lamp so much.

>>54008212
Wait a second.
Hang on.
>Q3 2022
>300% increase
Isn't that just reporting receipt of the splividend?

>>52743275
>links to a Reuters article
sheeeeeeit, it's happening

>>52704890
Sounds cool but I think you may have the wrong thread my friend.