/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15325693
if you believe in a retail chain of stores that sell clothing; sure
i mean their debt is on the same level as their assets, and some of that asset is intangible goodwill, which creeps me out
if wallmine isn't fritzing the fuck out; the short/float percentage is fucking haywire; do more research cause i really don't give as much of a fuck as you

>>9780799
I move my positions around a lot. After massive dips or rises (after good earnings beat) it's a safe bet that it'll recover after some time, but there've been cases where large stockholders will tank it some more, or that the stock will be day-traded by scalpers. Or it keeps going up and I miss out on more gains. Multi-day dips are fairly dependable to go up after a time, typically when buys and sells level out and invert.
The hardest part about trading on irrationality is that you can't completely predict it.

>>3457548
Listen my friend. I fucked up and bought Etherium a while ago at 320. The peak(ish) of Etherium on 6/18. I waited and held, despite my anger at myself for the poor play on my part.

I held until we broke through 320 and went further. I sold because I didn't want to deal with this anymore.

Bullshit happens anon, and all you can do is buy more and wait to see if there is another big recovery (which I recommend you do, as a single year risk of losing your savings is better than losing the potential gains of 3-6 years).

I hope this message recieves you well, and I hope my story steels you. Never sell at loss. Either you win or you shill.