/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18650206
Actually we do understand. You're the one who's not a developer and believe the fairy tales about Chainlink being decentralized or having and type of network effect. The facts literally prove you wrong. You just don't have the knowledge required to understand the facts (because you dont know how to code).

>>18644633
it's a centralized network (as confirmed by Vitalik).

And TEEs are made obsolete by Open Oracle. The data is signed, no need for TEEs.

It literally makes Chainlink obsolete. How about you learn to code and then maybe you can make some points that make sense?

>>18644652
Chainlink is centralized, as confirmed by Vitalik

>>18644661
No, it makes Chainlink obsolete. No one will use this with Chainlink, because it does Chainlink's job, but better. Sure you could use both, but no one will, cause it's redundant.

>>18533445
considering Vitalik has confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's centralized and will NOT be the "one" oracle solution...

no, it won't

>>18534944
>>18535055
>>18535073
>>18535110
>>18535141
>>18535158
>>18535168
>>18535178
>>18535279
considering Vitalik has confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's centralized and will NOT be the "one" oracle solution, yes it's going back to $2

>>18534233
you mean holding a centralized solution that Vitalik has confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt will NOT be the "one" oracle solution?

>>18522833
Why would Tezos use a centralized oracle solution?

>>18524267
Chainlink is centralized vaporware, as confirmed by Vitalik. And the partnerships have been confirmed fake, as per that reddit anon. The fundamentals literally couldn't be weaker.

>>18516342
>and first mover advantage
Chainlink has no first mover advantage.

There has been centralized oracles since 2015 on ETH, and they have way more users than chainlink. E.g. Augur, Maker, etc.

As far as decentralized oracles... Chainlink is not decentralized, so they have no first mover advantage in something they literally are not.

>>18505905
>Of course they do.
No, learn to code brainlet.

A decentralized protocol allows anyone to participate AND accomplishes sybil resistant consensus without ANY central party being able to censor or be needed to KYC.

Chainlink is literally none of that. It has 0 sybil resistance and literally will always require KYC to be "secure". It is literally centralized