/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52942444
checked

>>49451130
Yup when you spend enough time here you can feel the energy of the discord, and they are absolutely seething right now.. Their plans over the last week or two have been an absolute disaster.
First, fake hype that got instantly shouted down, then a quick pivot to fud, then absolutely seething that Sergey front-ran consensus with staking news.
They are going absolutely nuts right now and it's a joy to see. The amount of midwit nonsense that OGs have had to put up with from these faggots is immense.

Hell yeah

100% true

If I wanted to get a limited edition run of 500 high quality "sergey on horseback" porcelain figures (to sell to rich linkies) how would I go about that?
Could I just send some Chinese company a picture of Sergey and tell them to do the rest?

>tfw you're a leftist and ICO linkie who is making money hand over fist
cope

>>18291261
between 10 million and 100 million

Feel free to talk about anything Chainlink related. Shill, fud, whatever you like.

>>17560255
checked

>>17188888
<3 kek

>>16823878
>>16823860
honestly /biz/ has been fucking shit except for like 3 threads this past week or so, you've completely negated those shit threads my friend

>>16717631
>tfw in the top 1.8%
My dick just got hard, I’ll wank one out for both of us fren see you when the grass is greener

>>16495157
It requires the node operator and the buyer to both stake additional LINK in a separate contract. If = LINK dumps, node operator gets LINK out of the swap contract and covers their losses
If LINK = moons, buyer gets LINK out of the contract as if they had a leveraged position.

What's more notable than this functionality itself is the fact that people can literally create novel financial instruments (in this case functional options contracts) at fucking hackathons. Over a single week.
Think about what this means when this industry is established and people are building novel financial instruments at the rate they currently make smartphone apps.
Then imagine being a national regulator trying to put a leash around this shit. Impossible.

Feels good man

>>15585221
Just remember what it was like dumping back to $0.20. And that's how people feel now with it being $1.50. And next time people will be posting wojaks when it's at $6, then $20.
All we have to do is hold while the good news comes in, and call out discord faggots when they do fud frenzies like this.
We're all gonna make it.

>>15557438
YOU'RE A MANIAC!!!

>>15514876
Nice meme. Saved.

So for those who haven't bothered to read the two latest papers from Ari and co I'll summarise them into digestible points:
Mixicles is basically a new form of oracle powered smart contract structure that has some pretty interesting features in regards to making complex smart contracts useful. These include:
>the inputs and outputs of the smart contract can be obfuscated
This means the transacting parties can conceal from third parties the amount of money/assets that they have put into the smart contract, and the amount that they get out of it. Obviously very useful for business cases.
>The processing logic of the smart contract can be shown to third parties without revealing the parties or the inputs/outputs
This means that a regulatory body can be given "proof" that the smart contract was executed on certain terms, without giving away what might be private or proprietary information fed into the the smart contract. This is obviously extremely useful for pretty much any smart contract, as it allows for regulatory oversight and "proof of execution".
>Private oracle powered computation within a smart contract reduces pressure on TEEs.
Questions have been raised about the security capabilities of Trusted Execution Environments and Mixicles allow for many of their functions to be performed (like private execution within a smart contract) without having to rely on them. This is not to say that TEEs are now obsolete, and it is likely that they will be a crucial part of complex smart contracts moving forward, but it definitely reduces the reliance on TEEs in the short term when their security is uncertain.

I know it's going to be hard to have a discussion in a thread full of discord faggots trying to derail, but this tweet is actually pretty ridiculous.
It's like an internal memo. "Hey serg, I messaged you, call me back". But why post that on twitter? It's almost like uwu notice me link mawines

Well we've noticed you John. And we love you.

You're implying LINK is a bubble, which it's not.
You're implying LINKmarines need their hand held, which we don't.
You're implying we care if newfags get shaken out, which we don't.
You implying we're EVER. FUCKING. SELLING. EVER. WHICH WE'RE NEVER, EVER, EVER FUCKING DOING.

>>14343333

I'm here to join a cult, faggot, don't tell me how to live.

>https://youtu.be/ZUy4zrDUcDE?t=10
Holy fuck, the gloves are really off now. EOS BTFO.

My ID disagrees.