/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21834841
You do realize you can trade it on a normal exchange instead of a DEX?

>>21493404
Fake, but they can invest into the next x40 if they want

>>21334267
POWERFUL

>>21289139
Yes, you bend the knee to a false government which doesn't take care of it's people and abuses it's power. Crypto is the new form of government which doesn't need humans in order to govern itself and society. Certificates are the past and need to be phased out and trust needs to be decentralised.

>>21289440
LINK didn't even have good memes, I've literally got a meme folder on my google drive with 149 memes. that's literally alll the RLC memes in existence that I know off. And I've collected a few more in this thread (maybe 7). And I'm posting 1 meme per post and I made 68 posts by now, this being the 69th

>>21291899
In all honesty, I'd love this. Loading up more for 1$ sounds amazing, I've been in since 30c and I regret not buying 10k more

>>21292846
Well... If it isn't 500$ you still got time

>>21293235
A got stack is 5k+... A great stack is like 20k

>>21293393
Actually no... You need 100k and the price needs to be 100$. Or to put it in realistic perspective. If it had the same mcap as LINK right now, you'd need about 15k barrels to get to a million. realisticly you need 10-20k barrels to get to a million.

>>21293620
Well, if we get just a little adoption, 10-15k for a million is realistic. If we get LINK levels of adoption then maybe even less. I mean.... If Polkadot uses it as a parachain and it's successful and other people start to notice it could go huge. And if you google "Polkadot parachains", look at the images you'll se it is there. But it's just a question whether or not It'll be used from the start or included later...

Look at this if you haven't seen it yet (already posted this): https://forum.web3.foundation/t/teams-building-on-polkadot/67

>>21294360
I agree

>>21295220
Now let me read threw this so I can answer that guys question about "If it's homomorphic encryption or not". I believe it's not, since in the article it's separated... But first a cigarette, just woke up to find my thread on the 10th page and I saved it in time.

>>20233231
cont.

>While confidential computing can protect many types of applications and data, confidential computing technology provides a secure platform for multiple parties to combine, analyze and learn from sensitive data without exposing the data or machine learning algorithms to the other party.
>a secure platform
>for multiple parties to combine...etc (google, amazon, microsoft "working together" without having to compete)


>Often referred to as multi-party computing
Look up iExec's "Bag of Tasks"(BoT) update. It's multi-party compute capable.

>dedicated to defining and accelerating the adoption of confidential computing
This consortium, made up of all of the LARGEST tech companies in the world, is DEDICATED to ACCELERATING the ADOPTION of IEXEC.

>confidential computing can unlock the power of sensitive data by enabling collaboration while preserving privacy and compliance.
The bombshell. This is exactly what iExec enables, and can CURRENTLY do. It can CURRENTLY enable ANY large computing company to "unlock the power of sensitive data".

1 RLC = $11,490 is extremely plausible, when you consider the massive value of the compute market as well as the data market.

>dedicated to defining and accelerating the adoption of confidential computing
Another sneaky bombshell, too.

This consortium, made up of all of the LARGEST tech companies in the world, is DEDICATED to ACCELERATING the ADOPTION of IEXEC.

>>20156782
Gilles won't let it happen

So is the partnership with Huawei actually true?
Here is the source for reference https://twitter.com/iEx_ec/status/1085937503574638593

>>19975684
>>19975690
>>19975810
>>19976623
Gilles won't betray us
https://twitter.com/iEx_ec/status/1276852951823396865

>>19916461
Gilles here. I'm about to overload your motherboard.